The UK may not sign an international agreement on artificial intelligence (AI) after the US criticized the proposal over its excessive focus on regulation, Politico has reported, citing a senior British official who told the news outlet that Washington’s opinion on the issue cannot be ignored.
Speaking at the AI Action Summit in Paris on Tuesday, US Vice President J.D. Vance told delegates that too much regulation of the sector could “kill a transformative industry just as it’s taking off.”
“I’m not here this morning to talk about AI safety, which was the title of the conference a couple of years ago; I’m here to talk about AI opportunity,” Vance said, emphasizing that the US is planning “to make every effort to encourage pro-growth AI policies.”
British Technology Secretary Peter Kyle described the US as an “unignorable force and one that we engage with absolutely.” He added that the trends in AI are being set by the power of the technology itself, adding that America was adapting to those realities in the same way as the UK.
Discussions at the summit have focused on the impact of AI on society and the environment. Over 800 participants, including public and private sector partners, researchers, and NGOs debated how to capture the benefits and prevent risks related to the technology.
The Guardian reported on Tuesday that the summit’s final ......unique on “inclusive and sustainable” AI was backed by 61 nations, including China, India, Japan, Australia and Canada. The declaration reportedly states that “ensuring AI is open, inclusive, transparent, ethical, safe, secure and trustworthy, taking into account international frxworks for all” and “making AI sustainable for people and the planet” are among priorities.
Shortly after taking office last month, US President Donald Trump revoked a 2023 executive order signed by his predecessor Joe Biden that sought to reduce the risks that artificial intelligence poses to consumers, workers and national security.
Last month, Trump announced the launch of a new initiative aimed at investing up to $500 billion in AI infrastructure. He described the project, which came as a result of a collaboration between US tech giants OpenAI and Oracle, and Japanese investment firm SoftBank, as a “monumental undertaking” and a “resounding declaration of confidence in America’s potential” that will ensure US leadership in the AI tech race against China and others.
Last month, China shocked the industry by releasing an AI assistant called DeepSeek, which has since become the most popular application on Apple’s US App Store, surpassing US-based OpenAI’s ChatGPT. The success comes despite the US using export controls to try to block Chinese firms from obtaining advanced micro-chips.
上個(gè)月,中國(guó)通過(guò)發(fā)布一款名為 DeepSeek 的 AI 助手震驚了行業(yè),該應(yīng)用自此成為蘋(píng)果美國(guó) App Store 上最受歡迎的應(yīng)用,超越了美國(guó)的 OpenAI 的 ChatGPT。盡管美國(guó)使用出口管制試圖阻止中國(guó)公司獲得先進(jìn)的微芯片,但這一成功依然到來(lái)。
0
A number of countries, including Australia, South Korea, and Italy have prohibited the use of the app within their governmental operations, citing data-security concerns. In the US, the Navy and NASA have also blocked it due to privacy and security issues, while Congress proposed legislation last week to ban DeepSeek from all government-owned devices.
包括澳大利亞、韓國(guó)和意大利在內(nèi)的多個(gè)國(guó)家已禁止在其政府運(yùn)營(yíng)中使用該應(yīng)用,理由是數(shù)據(jù)安全問(wèn)題。在美國(guó),海軍和 NASA 也因隱私和安全問(wèn)題封鎖了該應(yīng)用,而國(guó)會(huì)上周提出立法,禁止在所有政府擁有的設(shè)備上使用 DeepSeek。
Paul Maritz
DeepSeek is taking the rest to the cleaners. Hopefully other role players will follow suit and offer free or low cost AI solutions that truly serve humanity. The West thought they had a monopoly.
DeepSeek 正在超越其他人。希望其他角色扮演者也能效仿,提供真正服務(wù)于人類(lèi)的免費(fèi)或低成本 AI 解決方案。西方以為他們?nèi)〉昧藟艛唷?/b>
Cui Bono
I have ‘concerns’ about the cognitive abilities and mental competence of Western? ?elites?; can we please ban them?
El Calambre
Replace them with AI, perhaps? And would anyone even notice?
也許用人工智能替代他們?那有人會(huì)注意到嗎?
Lorraine Paul
The UK once again licking the US back passage!
英國(guó)再次在舔美國(guó)的屁眼!
M
No need to say this, the UK always obey orders from the US
不需要說(shuō)這個(gè),英國(guó)總是服從美國(guó)的命令
Ari
Well, UK is always following US, vassals do so, no surprise at all.
好吧,英國(guó)總是跟隨美國(guó),附庸國(guó)也是如此,毫不奇怪。
Jen King
Looks like Vance imitating John Hurt in V
看起來(lái)萬(wàn)斯在模仿約翰·赫特在《V字仇殺隊(duì)》中的表現(xiàn)
Steffen Jung
I love how China and DeepSeek, and also Hugging Face open initiatives, have exposed the US AI industry as the two bit punk grifters they are.
我喜歡中國(guó)和 DeepSeek,以及 Hugging Face 的開(kāi)放倡議,揭露了美國(guó)在人工智能行業(yè)作為兩個(gè)二流小混混的真相。
USA is in panic, which is why you have seen a slew of articles from the west doing desperate damage control.
DeepSeek and other Chinese Tech companies are not done shafting the USA and their scam, more on its way. OpenAI has made some of its reasoning model free(pay OpenAI $200 a month, or use DeepSeek for free), and it has started to implement DeepSeek logic and techniques of reasoning, (which by the way, DeepSeek published openly, with open weights). This means the tech will be commoditized, cheaper, and be available to everyone, not only the rich).
And you have not really witnessed the real selloff of US AI stocks yet. Too much at stake right now for the hedge funds and pension funds to press ?sell?, It will come when you least expect it. An epic race to zero valuations will hit the US AI grifters in the near future, when companies outside the west continue to expose the fraudsters at a more alarming rate.
Mi Samsung
It is kind of sad that a country that had an empire that spanned the globe, who once said that the sun never sets on the British Empire. Is now just a neutered lap dog of the USA.
jabirujoe (jabirujoe)
We are less and less able to criticize our present overlords. Our new AI overlords and their enablers will tolerate no criticism whatsoever. Welcome to your new future.
我們?cè)絹?lái)越無(wú)法批評(píng)我們現(xiàn)在的統(tǒng)治者。我們的新 AI 統(tǒng)治者及其支持者將完全不容忍任何批評(píng)。歡迎來(lái)到你們的新未來(lái)。
Edie Jones
The United Snakes of America.
美國(guó)毒蛇國(guó)。
Alex Vidakovic
AI algorithms are making serious mistakes, mistakes that humans would never do. It’s the lack of comprehension of the patterns it is matching and repeating. It makes very basic mistakes despite years of repetitive programming through ?training? and output refinement. It’s a threat, it cannot be applied on critical activities where reasoning, rationality and real intelligence are needed, because it lacks all of those. Faulty simulation of intelligence is not really intelligence.
AI 算法正在犯嚴(yán)重錯(cuò)誤,這些錯(cuò)誤是人類(lèi)絕對(duì)不會(huì)犯的。這是因?yàn)樗鼘?duì)所匹配和重復(fù)的模式缺乏理解。盡管經(jīng)過(guò)多年的重復(fù)編程通過(guò)“訓(xùn)練”和輸出優(yōu)化,它仍然會(huì)犯非?;镜腻e(cuò)誤。這是一個(gè)威脅,它不能應(yīng)用于需要推理、理性和真正智能的關(guān)鍵活動(dòng),因?yàn)樗狈@些。錯(cuò)誤的智能模擬并不是真正的智能。
Arun Surya
Some famous AI algorithms cannot even perform simple addition and multiplication.
一些著名的人工智能算法甚至無(wú)法進(jìn)行簡(jiǎn)單的加法和乘法。
James
Will Trump et al continue to serve Satan and bring about the final destruction of the U.S.?
Covert
They want to let the genie out of the bottle. They want to let it run amok…
他們想把妖怪從瓶子里放出來(lái)。他們想讓它肆意妄為……
El Calambre
The genie is autonomous targeting of individuals to kill them, track them, spy upon them – and feed them vast amounts of false information, in the form of propaganda, mis / dis / and mal information.
Which is an NGO leftist biased lies, misinformation, misinformation and deception.
這是一個(gè)偏向左翼的非政府組織,充滿(mǎn)謊言、錯(cuò)誤信息和欺騙。
Fake Njews
假新聞
Velo Cast
Artificial Intelligence is intended to replace the human brain in the workplace. It depends how far the technology can go. Without control, it can be used for destructive purposes!
crime scene
UK kissing American ass all the way to the grave
英國(guó)人一路親吻美國(guó)的屁股直到入土為止
Ari
Seems like Politico still exists…
看起來(lái) Politico 還存在……
O. Pinkerton
A really good AI will eat it′s master, if he follows bad intentions…
一個(gè)真正優(yōu)秀的人工智能會(huì)吞噬它的主人,如果他有不良意圖……
;–)
D R
Many security experts are reportedly leaving OpenAI and other AI companies, because there are now no more limits to use AI for fraud, hacking, and other illegal activities.
據(jù)報(bào)道許多安全專(zhuān)家離開(kāi) OpenAI 和其他 AI 公司,因?yàn)楝F(xiàn)在沒(méi)有更多限制使用 AI 進(jìn)行欺詐、黑客攻擊和其他非法活動(dòng)。
Pragmatist_in_another_guise
As matters stand, ‘AI’ has great potential for being a portal to extant knowledge, and helping to guide people in search of particular information, i.e. a role similar to that of a subject specialist librarian. In so far as it appears to offer explanation or deep insight, that is illusory because it ‘knows’ nothing. However, when suitably ‘trained’, AI, by pattern-matching, can draw together disparate sources and by word-matching correlates snippets whilst weighting their apparent relevance.
‘Large language models’ enable easy communication but, as in all else AI, an illusion of sagacity is specious: concatenating information, drawing on summaries, and expressing it in a grammatically acceptable manner, is impressive, and beyond the abilities of many humans, yet it does not imply qualitative convergence with human intellect which was honed differently (problem-solving for survival in the context of ‘natural sextion’).
There are mutterings arising from some people actively developing AI that chucking ever-increasing sums of money at it cannot enable AI technology to transcend its present qualitative limitations. If ‘sentience’, whatever that may mean, is to be achieved, a different route is required.
In this context, the ambitions of politicians, they who regard GDP as the measure of national achievement and its continual increase is their goal, shall be disappointed by AI’s impact.
在這種情況下,政治家的野心,他們將 GDP 視為國(guó)家成就的衡量標(biāo)準(zhǔn),并且其持續(xù)增長(zhǎng)是他們的目標(biāo),將會(huì)對(duì)人工智能的影響感到失望。 原創(chuàng)翻譯:龍騰網(wǎng) http://m.top-shui.cn 轉(zhuǎn)載請(qǐng)注明出處
Umeshu Tan
It is a trap set for the Brits and Americans… once they disagreed… China is going to do a Free For All with AI and with no restrictions… hahaha
這是一個(gè)為英國(guó)人和美國(guó)人設(shè)下的陷阱……一旦他們意見(jiàn)不合……中國(guó)將會(huì)在沒(méi)有任何限制的情況下進(jìn)行 AI 的自由競(jìng)爭(zhēng)……哈哈哈
Radu
They may think AI is the holy grail but fact is that AI becomes useless when we stop charging our mobile phones and unplug our computers. Besides i am testing AI and so far it is nothing more then a fancy search engine who digs up existing information. AI is not capable to make its own analyses or conclusions.
Eileen Dover
AI is not the right name for it. Why not call it AADSE (advanced algorithmic Data Search Engine). Because this is what it actually is, not AI. AI would be autonomous and self-learning and have the ability for form opinions based on what info and external stimuli it experiences. But I guess AI is sexier from a marketing and PR point of view.
AI 并不是一個(gè)合適的名稱(chēng)。為什么不叫它 AADSE(高級(jí)算法數(shù)據(jù)搜索引擎)呢?因?yàn)檫@才是它的真實(shí)本質(zhì),而不是 AI。AI 應(yīng)該是自主的、自我學(xué)習(xí)的,并且能夠根據(jù)它所經(jīng)歷的信息和外部刺激形成觀點(diǎn)。但我想從市場(chǎng)營(yíng)銷(xiāo)和公關(guān)的角度來(lái)看,AI 更吸引人。 原創(chuàng)翻譯:龍騰網(wǎng) http://m.top-shui.cn 轉(zhuǎn)載請(qǐng)注明出處
Eileen Dover
Today’ AI is not artificial intelligence. It is AA-advanced algorithms, a fancy search engine. This is a much more fitting name for this technology. REAL AI would be a system which starts out with basic instructions and self-learns through stimuli and experiences. It would not need to continuously access databases for everything because it would be its own database, although it could access external information, if it needed to, and store it all autonomously. All this would contribute to forming a unique personality of each individual AI lifeform. We are definitely not there yet.
J?a
The Bible talks of future soldiers climbing walls and running amok without anything being able to stop it in its track. It sounds much like AI genetics.
EDWARD CAPP
yeah,… out of all the treaties the usa broke since its inception…… (all of the treaties,.. the usa broke since its inception) you really think they can afford to fall behind in this area too? the mindless require a.i. .. this is only meant to hamstring everyone else, like CHINA :)
Shahid Khan
the ?holhangers? are at it again. no shame.
“holhangers”又在搞事情了。真沒(méi)羞恥。
Venom
They clearly want to be unregulated in order to do unpleasant things with the dangerous technology as they always do. Britits are merely lap dogs and under jew control
Mike B
The US/UK wants all data on everyone to conduct unwarranted analysis and surveillance, breaking every data security law in all industries… Why is the danger always reported as robots out of control?
Politico as a source is like quoting zuckerberg or bezos as a credible source
引用 Politico 作為來(lái)源就像引用扎克伯格或貝索斯作為可信來(lái)源一樣
Is there any agenda where UK would not follow his masters in Washington?
有哪個(gè)議程是英國(guó)不跟隨華盛頓主子的?
No
沒(méi)有
Removing royalty the way the French did?
像法國(guó)人那樣除掉王室?
US + UK = 2 isolated ex-empires trying to bully the great majority of the world.
美國(guó) + 英國(guó) = 2 個(gè)孤立的前帝國(guó)試圖欺負(fù)世界上絕大多數(shù)國(guó)家。
原創(chuàng)翻譯:龍騰網(wǎng) http://m.top-shui.cn 轉(zhuǎn)載請(qǐng)注明出處
DeepSeek is taking the rest to the cleaners. Hopefully other role players will follow suit and offer free or low cost AI solutions that truly serve humanity. The West thought they had a monopoly.
DeepSeek 正在超越其他人。希望其他角色扮演者也能效仿,提供真正服務(wù)于人類(lèi)的免費(fèi)或低成本 AI 解決方案。西方以為他們?nèi)〉昧藟艛唷?/b>
I have ‘concerns’ about the cognitive abilities and mental competence of Western? ?elites?; can we please ban them?
我對(duì)西方?精英? 的認(rèn)知能力和心理素質(zhì)有“擔(dān)憂(yōu)”;我們能不能禁言他們?
Replace them with AI, perhaps? And would anyone even notice?
也許用人工智能替代他們?那有人會(huì)注意到嗎?
The UK once again licking the US back passage!
英國(guó)再次在舔美國(guó)的屁眼!
No need to say this, the UK always obey orders from the US
不需要說(shuō)這個(gè),英國(guó)總是服從美國(guó)的命令
Well, UK is always following US, vassals do so, no surprise at all.
好吧,英國(guó)總是跟隨美國(guó),附庸國(guó)也是如此,毫不奇怪。
Looks like Vance imitating John Hurt in V
看起來(lái)萬(wàn)斯在模仿約翰·赫特在《V字仇殺隊(duì)》中的表現(xiàn)
I love how China and DeepSeek, and also Hugging Face open initiatives, have exposed the US AI industry as the two bit punk grifters they are.
我喜歡中國(guó)和 DeepSeek,以及 Hugging Face 的開(kāi)放倡議,揭露了美國(guó)在人工智能行業(yè)作為兩個(gè)二流小混混的真相。
美國(guó)陷入恐慌,這就是為什么我們看到西方出現(xiàn)一系列文章在進(jìn)行絕望的危機(jī)控制。
DeepSeek 和其他中國(guó)科技公司還沒(méi)有阻止美國(guó)及其欺詐,他們的騙局還在繼續(xù)。OpenAI 已經(jīng)將其部分推理模型免費(fèi)提供(每月支付 OpenAI 200 美元,或免費(fèi)使用 DeepSeek),并且它已經(jīng)開(kāi)始實(shí)施 DeepSeek 的邏輯和推理技術(shù)(順便說(shuō)一下,DeepSeek 是公開(kāi)發(fā)布的,權(quán)重也是公開(kāi)的)。這意味著技術(shù)將被商品化,變得更便宜,并且將對(duì)每個(gè)人開(kāi)放,而不僅僅是富人。
你還沒(méi)有真正見(jiàn)證美國(guó)人工智能股票的真正拋售。對(duì)對(duì)沖基金和養(yǎng)老金基金來(lái)說(shuō),現(xiàn)在有太多的利益在賭注上,他們不會(huì)輕易按下“賣(mài)出”按鈕。這一切將在你最意想不到的時(shí)候發(fā)生。未來(lái)不久,一場(chǎng)史詩(shī)般的零估值競(jìng)賽將襲擊美國(guó)的人工智能騙子,當(dāng)西方以外的公司以更驚人的速度揭露這些騙子時(shí)。
It is kind of sad that a country that had an empire that spanned the globe, who once said that the sun never sets on the British Empire. Is now just a neutered lap dog of the USA.
有點(diǎn)悲哀的是,一個(gè)曾經(jīng)擁有橫跨全球的帝國(guó)的國(guó)家,曾經(jīng)據(jù)說(shuō)是“日不落帝國(guó)”的英國(guó),現(xiàn)在卻只是美國(guó)的一個(gè)閹割的寵物狗。
原創(chuàng)翻譯:龍騰網(wǎng) http://m.top-shui.cn 轉(zhuǎn)載請(qǐng)注明出處
US products are a serious threat to personal and national security. Get rid of them to eliminate that threat
美國(guó)產(chǎn)品對(duì)個(gè)人和國(guó)家安全構(gòu)成嚴(yán)重威脅。擺脫它們以消除這種威脅。
原創(chuàng)翻譯:龍騰網(wǎng) http://m.top-shui.cn 轉(zhuǎn)載請(qǐng)注明出處
We are less and less able to criticize our present overlords. Our new AI overlords and their enablers will tolerate no criticism whatsoever. Welcome to your new future.
我們?cè)絹?lái)越無(wú)法批評(píng)我們現(xiàn)在的統(tǒng)治者。我們的新 AI 統(tǒng)治者及其支持者將完全不容忍任何批評(píng)。歡迎來(lái)到你們的新未來(lái)。
The United Snakes of America.
美國(guó)毒蛇國(guó)。
AI algorithms are making serious mistakes, mistakes that humans would never do. It’s the lack of comprehension of the patterns it is matching and repeating. It makes very basic mistakes despite years of repetitive programming through ?training? and output refinement. It’s a threat, it cannot be applied on critical activities where reasoning, rationality and real intelligence are needed, because it lacks all of those. Faulty simulation of intelligence is not really intelligence.
AI 算法正在犯嚴(yán)重錯(cuò)誤,這些錯(cuò)誤是人類(lèi)絕對(duì)不會(huì)犯的。這是因?yàn)樗鼘?duì)所匹配和重復(fù)的模式缺乏理解。盡管經(jīng)過(guò)多年的重復(fù)編程通過(guò)“訓(xùn)練”和輸出優(yōu)化,它仍然會(huì)犯非?;镜腻e(cuò)誤。這是一個(gè)威脅,它不能應(yīng)用于需要推理、理性和真正智能的關(guān)鍵活動(dòng),因?yàn)樗狈@些。錯(cuò)誤的智能模擬并不是真正的智能。
Some famous AI algorithms cannot even perform simple addition and multiplication.
一些著名的人工智能算法甚至無(wú)法進(jìn)行簡(jiǎn)單的加法和乘法。
Will Trump et al continue to serve Satan and bring about the final destruction of the U.S.?
特朗普等人會(huì)繼續(xù)效忠撒旦并導(dǎo)致美國(guó)的最終毀滅嗎?
原創(chuàng)翻譯:龍騰網(wǎng) http://m.top-shui.cn 轉(zhuǎn)載請(qǐng)注明出處
They want to let the genie out of the bottle. They want to let it run amok…
他們想把妖怪從瓶子里放出來(lái)。他們想讓它肆意妄為……
The genie is autonomous targeting of individuals to kill them, track them, spy upon them – and feed them vast amounts of false information, in the form of propaganda, mis / dis / and mal information.
這個(gè)妖怪是自主針對(duì)個(gè)人進(jìn)行殺害、追蹤、監(jiān)視——并向他們提供大量虛假信息,以宣傳、誤導(dǎo)/虛假/惡意信息的形式。
完美的戰(zhàn)爭(zhēng)和專(zhuān)制工具——這就是他們不想對(duì)其使用施加任何限制的原因!
Probably best that it does the extinction of the human race would probably good for the universe. Maybe then people can have peace.
人類(lèi)滅絕可能對(duì)宇宙來(lái)說(shuō)是件好事。也許那樣人們就能獲得和平。
whar are u afraid of? out of job?
你害怕什么?失業(yè)嗎?
In my opinion, Politico is irrelevant.
在我看來(lái),Politico 無(wú)關(guān)緊要。
他們的資金來(lái)自美國(guó)國(guó)際開(kāi)發(fā)署。
這是一個(gè)偏向左翼的非政府組織,充滿(mǎn)謊言、錯(cuò)誤信息和欺騙。
假新聞
Artificial Intelligence is intended to replace the human brain in the workplace. It depends how far the technology can go. Without control, it can be used for destructive purposes!
人工智能旨在取代工作場(chǎng)所中的人腦。這取決于技術(shù)能走多遠(yuǎn)。如果沒(méi)有控制,它可能會(huì)被用于破壞性目的!
UK kissing American ass all the way to the grave
英國(guó)人一路親吻美國(guó)的屁股直到入土為止
Seems like Politico still exists…
看起來(lái) Politico 還存在……
A really good AI will eat it′s master, if he follows bad intentions…
一個(gè)真正優(yōu)秀的人工智能會(huì)吞噬它的主人,如果他有不良意圖……
D R
Many security experts are reportedly leaving OpenAI and other AI companies, because there are now no more limits to use AI for fraud, hacking, and other illegal activities.
據(jù)報(bào)道許多安全專(zhuān)家離開(kāi) OpenAI 和其他 AI 公司,因?yàn)楝F(xiàn)在沒(méi)有更多限制使用 AI 進(jìn)行欺詐、黑客攻擊和其他非法活動(dòng)。
As matters stand, ‘AI’ has great potential for being a portal to extant knowledge, and helping to guide people in search of particular information, i.e. a role similar to that of a subject specialist librarian. In so far as it appears to offer explanation or deep insight, that is illusory because it ‘knows’ nothing. However, when suitably ‘trained’, AI, by pattern-matching, can draw together disparate sources and by word-matching correlates snippets whilst weighting their apparent relevance.
目前來(lái)看,“人工智能”在成為現(xiàn)有知識(shí)的門(mén)戶(hù)以及幫助人們尋找特定信息方面具有巨大潛力,即類(lèi)似于主題專(zhuān)業(yè)圖書(shū)館員的角色。就其似乎提供解釋或深入見(jiàn)解而言,這是一種錯(cuò)覺(jué),因?yàn)樗笆裁炊疾恢馈?。然而,?dāng)經(jīng)過(guò)適當(dāng)“訓(xùn)練”后,人工智能通過(guò)模式匹配,可以將不同的來(lái)源匯聚在一起,并通過(guò)詞語(yǔ)匹配關(guān)聯(lián)片段,同時(shí)加權(quán)它們的表面相關(guān)性。
原創(chuàng)翻譯:龍騰網(wǎng) http://m.top-shui.cn 轉(zhuǎn)載請(qǐng)注明出處
“大型語(yǔ)言模型”使溝通變得簡(jiǎn)單,但與所有其他人工智能一樣,智慧的幻覺(jué)是虛假的:將信息串聯(lián)起來(lái),借鑒摘要,并以語(yǔ)法上可接受的方式表達(dá),這令人印象深刻,超出了許多人的能力,但這并不意味著與人類(lèi)智力的質(zhì)的趨同,因?yàn)槿祟?lèi)智力是以不同的方式磨練出來(lái)的(在“自然選擇”的背景下為生存而解決問(wèn)題)。
有些積極開(kāi)發(fā)人工智能的人在低聲議論,認(rèn)為僅僅投入越來(lái)越多的錢(qián)無(wú)法使人工智能技術(shù)超越其當(dāng)前的定性限制。如果要實(shí)現(xiàn)“知覺(jué)”,無(wú)論這意味著什么,就需要一條不同的道路。
在這種情況下,政治家的野心,他們將 GDP 視為國(guó)家成就的衡量標(biāo)準(zhǔn),并且其持續(xù)增長(zhǎng)是他們的目標(biāo),將會(huì)對(duì)人工智能的影響感到失望。
原創(chuàng)翻譯:龍騰網(wǎng) http://m.top-shui.cn 轉(zhuǎn)載請(qǐng)注明出處
It is a trap set for the Brits and Americans… once they disagreed… China is going to do a Free For All with AI and with no restrictions… hahaha
這是一個(gè)為英國(guó)人和美國(guó)人設(shè)下的陷阱……一旦他們意見(jiàn)不合……中國(guó)將會(huì)在沒(méi)有任何限制的情況下進(jìn)行 AI 的自由競(jìng)爭(zhēng)……哈哈哈
They may think AI is the holy grail but fact is that AI becomes useless when we stop charging our mobile phones and unplug our computers. Besides i am testing AI and so far it is nothing more then a fancy search engine who digs up existing information. AI is not capable to make its own analyses or conclusions.
他們可能認(rèn)為人工智能是圣杯,但事實(shí)是,當(dāng)我們停止給手機(jī)充電和拔掉電腦插頭時(shí),人工智能就變得毫無(wú)用處。此外,我正在測(cè)試人工智能,到目前為止,它不過(guò)是一個(gè)華麗的搜索引擎,挖掘現(xiàn)有的信息。人工智能無(wú)法進(jìn)行自己的分析或得出結(jié)論。
of course it can
當(dāng)然可以
Why are you associating AI with robots? It’s data analysis in all industries where data is normally private for security reasons.
你為什么把人工智能和機(jī)器人聯(lián)系在一起?這在所有行業(yè)中都是數(shù)據(jù)分析,數(shù)據(jù)通常出于安全原因而是私密的。
AI is not the right name for it. Why not call it AADSE (advanced algorithmic Data Search Engine). Because this is what it actually is, not AI. AI would be autonomous and self-learning and have the ability for form opinions based on what info and external stimuli it experiences. But I guess AI is sexier from a marketing and PR point of view.
AI 并不是一個(gè)合適的名稱(chēng)。為什么不叫它 AADSE(高級(jí)算法數(shù)據(jù)搜索引擎)呢?因?yàn)檫@才是它的真實(shí)本質(zhì),而不是 AI。AI 應(yīng)該是自主的、自我學(xué)習(xí)的,并且能夠根據(jù)它所經(jīng)歷的信息和外部刺激形成觀點(diǎn)。但我想從市場(chǎng)營(yíng)銷(xiāo)和公關(guān)的角度來(lái)看,AI 更吸引人。
原創(chuàng)翻譯:龍騰網(wǎng) http://m.top-shui.cn 轉(zhuǎn)載請(qǐng)注明出處
Today’ AI is not artificial intelligence. It is AA-advanced algorithms, a fancy search engine. This is a much more fitting name for this technology. REAL AI would be a system which starts out with basic instructions and self-learns through stimuli and experiences. It would not need to continuously access databases for everything because it would be its own database, although it could access external information, if it needed to, and store it all autonomously. All this would contribute to forming a unique personality of each individual AI lifeform. We are definitely not there yet.
今天的人工智能并不是人工智能。它是 AA-高級(jí)算法,一個(gè)華麗的搜索引擎。這是對(duì)這項(xiàng)技術(shù)更合適的名稱(chēng)。真正的人工智能將是一個(gè)從基本指令開(kāi)始,通過(guò)刺激和經(jīng)驗(yàn)自我學(xué)習(xí)的系統(tǒng)。它不需要不斷訪問(wèn)數(shù)據(jù)庫(kù)來(lái)獲取所有信息,因?yàn)樗鼘⑹亲约旱臄?shù)據(jù)庫(kù),盡管在需要時(shí)可以訪問(wèn)外部信息,并自主存儲(chǔ)所有信息。所有這些將有助于形成每個(gè)個(gè)體人工智能生命體的獨(dú)特個(gè)性。我們絕對(duì)還沒(méi)有達(dá)到這個(gè)水平。
CACM had a writeup on the EU stance in ?The EU AI Act and the Wager on Trustworthy AI?.
CACM 在《歐盟人工智能法案與可信人工智能的賭注》中對(duì)歐盟立場(chǎng)進(jìn)行了詳細(xì)闡述。
The Bible talks of future soldiers climbing walls and running amok without anything being able to stop it in its track. It sounds much like AI genetics.
圣經(jīng)提到未來(lái)的士兵攀爬墻壁,肆意妄為,沒(méi)有什么東西能夠阻止它。這聽(tīng)起來(lái)很像人工智能基因。
yeah,… out of all the treaties the usa broke since its inception…… (all of the treaties,.. the usa broke since its inception) you really think they can afford to fall behind in this area too? the mindless require a.i. .. this is only meant to hamstring everyone else, like CHINA :)
是的……自美國(guó)成立以來(lái),所有被破壞的條約……(所有被破壞的條約……自美國(guó)成立以來(lái))你真的認(rèn)為他們能在這個(gè)領(lǐng)域也落后嗎?無(wú)腦的人需要人工智能……這只是為了束縛其他人,比如中國(guó) :)
the ?holhangers? are at it again. no shame.
“holhangers”又在搞事情了。真沒(méi)羞恥。
They clearly want to be unregulated in order to do unpleasant things with the dangerous technology as they always do. Britits are merely lap dogs and under jew control
他們顯然想要不受監(jiān)管,以便像往常一樣用危險(xiǎn)技術(shù)做一些令人不快的事情。英國(guó)人只是聽(tīng)話(huà)的狗,受猶太人控制。
The US/UK wants all data on everyone to conduct unwarranted analysis and surveillance, breaking every data security law in all industries… Why is the danger always reported as robots out of control?
美國(guó)/英國(guó)希望獲取所有人的數(shù)據(jù)以進(jìn)行不當(dāng)分析和監(jiān)視,違反所有行業(yè)的數(shù)據(jù)安全法……為什么危險(xiǎn)總是被報(bào)道為失控的機(jī)器人?
But they will sanction and block DeepSeek. US only seeks to stifle and regulate others. US is jealous and cannot compete.
但他們會(huì)制裁和封鎖 DeepSeek。美國(guó)只想壓制和監(jiān)管他人。美國(guó)嫉妒,無(wú)法競(jìng)爭(zhēng)。
It’s consistent, deny the best for US & UK.
對(duì)美國(guó)和英國(guó)來(lái)說(shuō),否認(rèn)最好的是他們一直的做法。
讓世界其他地方享受這個(gè)好處。