釋放強(qiáng)大火力：中國054B型護(hù)衛(wèi)艦實(shí)彈射擊震撼展示！
Unleashing Pain: China Type 054B Frigate Live Firing in Action!
譯文簡介
中國人民解放軍海軍發(fā)布了一段引人注目的視頻，展示了新服役的054B型護(hù)衛(wèi)艦“洛河號”在海上實(shí)彈射擊的畫面。
正文翻譯
The Chinese PLA Navy published a dramatic video showing the newly commissioned Type 054B frigate, the Luohe, live firing at sea.
中國人民解放軍海軍發(fā)布了一段引人注目的視頻，展示了新服役的054B型護(hù)衛(wèi)艦“洛河號”在海上實(shí)彈射擊的畫面。
評論翻譯
很贊 ( 29 )
收藏
One Type 054B frigate can sink the entire Royal Canadian Navy ...sad, but true !
一艘054B型護(hù)衛(wèi)艦就能擊沉整個(gè)加拿大皇家海軍……令人遺憾，但卻是事實(shí)！
Hey you. What are you talking about. There is no Canadian Navy only U.S. Navy, Canada is the 51st state of America. Got that
嘿，你在說什么？根本沒有什么加拿大海軍，只有美國海軍，加拿大就是美國的第51個(gè)州，明白了嗎？
@yndiiatecow2536 lM straight to the yugular
@yndiiatecow2536 笑死了，直擊要害。
Nah... That's a little too much. 054B is for anti-submarine and low intensity missions, it can't lauch long range anti-ship missles.
不，這有點(diǎn)夸張了，054B主要用于反潛和低強(qiáng)度任務(wù)，無法發(fā)射遠(yuǎn)程反艦導(dǎo)彈。
Even Canada has a navy these days? Learning something new everyday.
現(xiàn)在連加拿大都有海軍了嗎？每天都能學(xué)到新知識呢。
I actually genuinely agree with you ? @MohajonFromEast
我真的完全同意你的看法 ?@MohajonFromEast
wait... Canada has a Navy?
等等……加拿大有海軍嗎？
@shawnmen9805 LM ...yeah the newest ships are the 12x City Class frigates commissioned between 1992 and 1996 which makes them 29-33 years old. Non of them have VLS. One Type 054B alone has 32 VLS which means there are 2-3 missiles marked for the entire Canadian surface combatant fleet !
@shawnmen9805 哈哈哈，是啊，最新的艦艇是1992年到1996年間服役的12艘城市級護(hù)衛(wèi)艦，意味著這些艦艇已經(jīng)有29到33年的船齡了，而且它們沒有垂直發(fā)射系統(tǒng)，而一艘054B型護(hù)衛(wèi)艦單獨(dú)就配備了32個(gè)垂直發(fā)射單元，也就是說，給加拿大整個(gè)水面艦隊(duì)每艘分配2到3枚！
原創(chuàng)翻譯：龍騰網(wǎng) http://m.top-shui.cn 轉(zhuǎn)載請注明出處
what's sad about it? Canada should have no reason to fight China... As long as Canada doesn't follow the US in picking a fight with China - Canada should have nothing to be sad about
這有什么可悲的呢？加拿大沒有理由與中國對抗，只要加拿大不跟隨美國挑釁中國，那么加拿大就不應(yīng)該有任何值得悲傷的地方。
@Amidat The silly beaver is in the South China Seas ! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y4yUXcMIz3U&t=11s
@Amidat 傻乎乎的海貍居然跑到南海去了！
@ltrond If necessary, the 054B can also carry anti-ship missiles and perform tasks independently. It's just that in China's naval sequence, it is generally not the turn of 054B to take on this task, but it is not impossible
@ltrond 如果有必要，054B完全可以搭載反艦導(dǎo)彈并獨(dú)立執(zhí)行任務(wù)，只不過在中國海軍的序列中通常輪不到054B，但這并不意味著它無法完成這樣的任務(wù)。
Well considering our Halifax class frigates were designed in the 80's mainly for anti Soviet submarine work, and that the youngest of them, the HMCS Ville de Québec, launched on May 16, 1991, is now approximately 33 years old, so that's not too surprising they are out classed by the PLAN's newest Type 054B frigates.
However, our new River class destroyer, which is basically a Canadianized version of the British BEA Type-26 frigate should be on par with the best the PlAN's frigates.
考慮到加拿大的哈利法克斯級護(hù)衛(wèi)艦是在20世紀(jì)80年代設(shè)計(jì)的，主要是為了反制蘇聯(lián)的潛艇活動，而其中最年輕的一艘“魁北克城號”護(hù)衛(wèi)艦是在1991年5月16日下水，如今已有大約33年的服役時(shí)間，因此被中國人民解放軍最新的054B型護(hù)衛(wèi)艦超越也并不意外。
不過，加拿大的新款“河”級驅(qū)逐艦實(shí)際上是英國產(chǎn)BAE Type-26護(hù)衛(wèi)艦的本土化版本，性能應(yīng)該可以與中國最新型護(hù)衛(wèi)艦媲美。
@Amidat There is that.
@Amidat 是這樣的。
@gumpyoldbugger6944 The youngest City Class frigate is the HMCS Ottawa commissioned in 1996. The River class frigates won't be in service till 2040 which by then will be obsolete against anything the PLAN has let alone a surface combatant like the Type 052 or Type 055. In all simulations so far the British BEA Type-26 frigates are no match for the Type 052 let alone the Type 055 !
@ gumpyoldbugger6944 年紀(jì)最小的City級護(hù)衛(wèi)艦是1996年服役的HMCS Ottawa，而River級護(hù)衛(wèi)艦要到2040年才能服役，到那時(shí)候它們與中國海軍的任何裝備相比都會過時(shí)，更不用說與諸如052型或055型這樣的水面戰(zhàn)艦較量了。目前所有的模擬結(jié)果表明，英國BAE公司研發(fā)的26型護(hù)衛(wèi)艦在性能上無法與052型抗衡，更不用說055型了。
Words can't describe how pretty this ship is!
言語難以形容這艘船的美麗！
原創(chuàng)翻譯：龍騰網(wǎng) http://m.top-shui.cn 轉(zhuǎn)載請注明出處
yup....she is a looker alright.
嗯，她確實(shí)很有魅力。
The Chinese should do build some very pretty warships, I love the hue of their gray paint, reminds a bit of the hue used by the RNC.
中國應(yīng)該造一些非常漂亮的軍艦，我很喜歡他們灰色涂裝的色調(diào)，有點(diǎn)讓我想起美國共和黨全國委員會使用的顏色。
Good stuff.
不錯(cuò)的內(nèi)容
DID the 2nd Type 054B enter service? Along the 27th type 052D????
第二艘054B型護(hù)衛(wèi)艦是否已經(jīng)服役？與第27艘052D型驅(qū)逐艦同時(shí)嗎？
原創(chuàng)翻譯：龍騰網(wǎng) http://m.top-shui.cn 轉(zhuǎn)載請注明出處
Like who cares? They are just Temu ships of crappy quality.
誰會在意呢？它們只是一些質(zhì)量很差的Temu船而已。
? @williamho1976 what ship is not temu quality in ur opinion? Not like i care but dont u mean 40 out of 70 arleigh burkes with a mean age of 40 years
你認(rèn)為哪艘軍艦的質(zhì)量不符合Temu的標(biāo)準(zhǔn)？雖然我并不在意，但你是不是指70艘阿利·伯克級驅(qū)逐艦中有40艘，平均服役年齡達(dá)到了40年？
Did 36th type 052D got launched too?
第36艘052D型驅(qū)逐艦也下水了嗎？
@williamho1976 lM, you get what you pay for. Pay less? get shit, Pay more? you get better shit
@williamho1976 哈哈，真是錢多錢少決定品質(zhì)，花錢少就只能得到差的東西，花錢多才能得到好一點(diǎn)的東西。
@alvinluo150 Not necessarily true, inflated labour costs and lack of efficiency from economies of scale can make production in one country be much higher than the other for the same quality (I'm not claiming that quality of US vessels vs Chinese are equal). Not to mention the disproportionate political (in)efficiencies and lobbying that goes into some military projects for the USA.
@alvinluo150 不一定正確，勞動成本的上漲以及規(guī)模經(jīng)濟(jì)效率的缺乏可能導(dǎo)致在同等質(zhì)量的情況下，一個(gè)國家的生產(chǎn)成本遠(yuǎn)遠(yuǎn)高于另一個(gè)國家（我并不是說美國與中國船舶的質(zhì)量是相等的）。更不用說美國一些軍事項(xiàng)目中存在的不合理政治效率以及游說活動對成本的影響。
?@williamho1976 ... Yet you're having TEMU TREMORS, duh! No?
@williamho1976 ... 你卻因?yàn)門EMU船而緊張得發(fā)抖，不是嗎？
?@williamho1976 Chinese warships are not equipped with autopilot to crash cargo ships for sure, unlike your master's naval ships which are all capable with the option
@williamho1976 中國軍艦當(dāng)然沒有裝備自動駕駛功能來撞貨船，不像你主子的海軍艦艇都配有這種選項(xiàng) /笑哭哈哈
@williamho1976 The US Department of Defense, which is full of analysts who have accomplished far more than your entire bloodline ever will, does.
@williamho1976 美國國防部擁有眾多分析專家，他們?nèi)〉玫某删瓦h(yuǎn)遠(yuǎn)超過你的整個(gè)家族將來的任何可能成就。
The 2nd 054B has appeared to have entered service. For the 27th 052D, it possibly may have (looks to be DDG #166), but we'll have to see.
第二艘054B似乎已經(jīng)服役，而第27艘052D可能也已經(jīng)服役（看起來是166號驅(qū)逐艦），但還需要進(jìn)一步確認(rèn)。
@williamho1976 Cope
@williamho1976 自我安慰吧
Curious will the PLAN make more 54b or will it be a testing version like 52C. And you end up with even better one. May be 54C or D
好奇中國海軍是否會制造更多的054B型護(hù)衛(wèi)艦還是會像052C那樣出現(xiàn)某種測試版本，最終升級到更先進(jìn)的型號，比如054C或054D。
原創(chuàng)翻譯：龍騰網(wǎng) http://m.top-shui.cn 轉(zhuǎn)載請注明出處
China's naval equipment is always built on the platform first, and then the equipment is gradually upxed. So I don't think there will be a finalized model. As long as there are new, mature, and deployable technologies, it will keep improving until the platform can no longer carry more new technologies
中國的海軍裝備通常是先搭建平臺，然后再逐步更新相關(guān)設(shè)備，因此我認(rèn)為不會有最終定型的型號，只要有新的成熟技術(shù)可以投入使用它就會不斷升級，直到平臺無法承載更多的新技術(shù)為止。
We don't know yet... Maybe later they want to install longer universal VLS so 054B will be transitional unit
我們目前還不知道……也許之后他們想要安裝更長的通用垂直發(fā)射系統(tǒng)，那么054B可能會成為過渡型號。
原創(chuàng)翻譯：龍騰網(wǎng) http://m.top-shui.cn 轉(zhuǎn)載請注明出處
did they try to launch several of their anti ship missiles at one of their frigates armed with the "seawiz" phalanx system (or whatever it is called) - to see if it would stop the missiles?
他們是否曾嘗試向裝備有“密集陣”近防系統(tǒng)（或類似系統(tǒng)）的護(hù)衛(wèi)艦發(fā)射多枚反艦導(dǎo)彈，以測試該系統(tǒng)是否能夠攔截這些導(dǎo)彈？
Cool
很酷 /愛心
The combat capability of 054B is closer to 052B
054B的作戰(zhàn)能力更接近052B。
052 is a destroyer. 054 is a frigate.
052是驅(qū)逐艦，054是護(hù)衛(wèi)艦。
Exactly his point?
他到底是想說什么？
jesus is impressed
耶穌感到震撼。
BGM有點(diǎn)熟，想不起來名字
背景音樂有點(diǎn)耳熟，但一時(shí)想不起名字。
Damn, I was hoping to see live firing of the latest Chinese hypersonic missles or something..
真是遺憾，我原本希望能看到最新的中國高超音速導(dǎo)彈進(jìn)行實(shí)彈發(fā)射之類的場面。
Chinese naval power world number one
中國海軍力量已是世界第一。
原創(chuàng)翻譯：龍騰網(wǎng) http://m.top-shui.cn 轉(zhuǎn)載請注明出處
Now China needs to figure out a way to reload the missiles without making port.
現(xiàn)在中國需要想辦法在不靠港的情況下重新裝載導(dǎo)彈。
There is a supply ship."
他們有一艘補(bǔ)給艦。
@???????? But it can't reload the VLS cells. For that the ship have to go back to port
但它無法重新裝填垂直發(fā)射單元，為了做到這一點(diǎn)艦艇必須返回港口。
Lol you must be watching too much hollywood.
lol，你肯定是看太多好萊塢電影了吧。
Not really. It's not like the US can do it either really nor do I think they'll be able to find a way to do it efficiently any time soon and at a larger scale. All of China's interests and goals are within their region; there's no need to try and gain this capability unless deemed fit. Too many people think China needs to emulate whatever the US is doing when that isn't the case.
不完全是這樣，美國也未必能做到，我也不認(rèn)為他們能在短期內(nèi)找到高效且大規(guī)模實(shí)現(xiàn)的方法。中國的所有利益與目標(biāo)都集中在自身區(qū)域內(nèi)，除非被認(rèn)為必要，否則沒有必要去追求這樣的能力。太多人以為中國需要模仿美國的一切，但事實(shí)并非如此。
@Flightman453 exactly... China does not need to emulate the US
@Flightman453 沒錯(cuò)，中國完全沒必要效仿美國。
Remember the time the Chinese Navy won a battle?
Like, ever?
你能想起中國海軍曾經(jīng)贏過任何一場戰(zhàn)斗嗎？比如。。。有過嗎？
So what? You want a battle, come and try!
那又怎樣？想要較量的話，就來試試吧！
When was the last time they went to war??? A short land war against the Vietnamese back in the late 70's.
When was the last time the USN actually fought a peer navy? 1945 wasn't it? Apart from that all the USN has been doing is picking fights with smaller nations and conducting air strikes on relatively undefended areas.
The last western Navy to fight a naval battle with a near peer was the RN during the Falkands War, and although the RN won, it paid a fearful price. So don't get too complacent and self assured that the USN would fair well going up against the PLAN, especially in the PLAN's backyard.
上一次他們參戰(zhàn)是什么時(shí)候？是在70年代末時(shí)與越南進(jìn)行了一場短暫的陸地戰(zhàn)爭吧。
至于美國海軍上一次真正與一個(gè)同等實(shí)力的海軍交戰(zhàn)是什么時(shí)候？是1945年不是嗎？除此之外，美國海軍基本上就在與較小國家挑起爭端，或是在無法還手的地區(qū)進(jìn)行空襲。
至于西方最后一次與近似實(shí)力的海軍進(jìn)行海戰(zhàn)，則是英國皇家海軍在馬島戰(zhàn)爭中。雖然英國最終取得了勝利，但付出了極大的代價(jià)。所以不要過于自滿或自認(rèn)為美國海軍在與中國海軍對抗時(shí)會異常順利，尤其是在對方的勢力范圍內(nèi)進(jìn)行交戰(zhàn)。
原創(chuàng)翻譯：龍騰網(wǎng) http://m.top-shui.cn 轉(zhuǎn)載請注明出處
China should make a bigger destroyer that can launch DF 41...That is a game changer.
中國應(yīng)該制造一艘可以發(fā)射東風(fēng)41的大型驅(qū)逐艦，這將成為改變局勢的關(guān)鍵。
I have a name for this kind of ship "Battledestroyer" just like "Battlecrusier" in the past.
我給這類艦船起了一個(gè)名字叫“戰(zhàn)列驅(qū)逐艦”，就像過去的“戰(zhàn)列巡洋艦”。
That's call a nuclear sub.
那叫做核潛艇。
?? @gelinrefira No way a Sub can carry such huge missile and the take off can send the sub to the bottom of ocean. A floating Destroyer can do the job.
@gelinrefira 不可能有潛艇能攜帶如此巨大的導(dǎo)彈，而且這樣的導(dǎo)彈發(fā)射可能會讓潛艇沉入海底，一艘浮動的驅(qū)逐艦才可以完成這個(gè)任務(wù)。
Ummm, . . . . , Monday was the 17th of March, Wednesday was the 19th.
嗯……星期一是3月17日，星期三是3月19日。
My bad. I was actually meant to put Tuesday 18 March... oh well
是我的失誤，我本來是想寫星期二，3月18日…歐，無所謂了。
China is truly number one.
中國才是真正的第一。
2:21 Why only one gun? Or this is how it should be?
2分21秒，為什么只有一座火炮？或者說這本來就是設(shè)計(jì)如此？
modern warships don't need that many cannons, most of them have less than 2 and typically 152/155/130/100mm
現(xiàn)代軍艦并不需要配備太多火炮，大多數(shù)僅裝備少于兩門，且通?？趶綖?52毫米、155毫米、130毫米或100毫米。
原創(chuàng)翻譯：龍騰網(wǎng) http://m.top-shui.cn 轉(zhuǎn)載請注明出處
It's a frigate. What ships today do you that have more than one main gun?
這是一艘護(hù)衛(wèi)艦，現(xiàn)如今有哪些艦船配備多門主炮？
It has a CRAM in the back, so it was a CWIS in the front and CWIS (Missiles) in the rear. Look it up.
它后部配備了一套反導(dǎo)彈近防系統(tǒng)（CRAM），所以前部是海軍密集陣近防系統(tǒng)（CWIS），而后部則是帶導(dǎo)彈的近防系統(tǒng)，具體細(xì)節(jié)可以查閱相關(guān)資料。
That's that's the most most modern frigates and destroyers carry, mainly for air defense then anti-ship work. The true striking power of a modern frigate and destroyer comes from the VLS and missiles.
這是現(xiàn)代護(hù)衛(wèi)艦和驅(qū)逐艦主要裝備的武器，主要用于防空，其次是反艦作戰(zhàn)，而現(xiàn)代護(hù)衛(wèi)艦和驅(qū)逐艦的真正打擊力量來自垂直發(fā)射系統(tǒng)和導(dǎo)彈。
原創(chuàng)翻譯：龍騰網(wǎng) http://m.top-shui.cn 轉(zhuǎn)載請注明出處
Why the stupid music? I'd rather hear the live firing.
為什么放這么愚蠢的音樂？我寧愿聽到現(xiàn)場的火炮聲。
Bit boring, no missile launches.
有點(diǎn)無聊，沒有導(dǎo)彈發(fā)射的場面。
Type 054B feel like an European ship, large hull, little weapons.
054B型感覺更像一艘歐洲的艦艇，船體較大但武器較少。
I wouldn't call, what is it? 32? I wouldn't call 32 VLS cells as having little in the way of weapons.
我不會這么說，你說啥？32？我不會說32個(gè)垂直發(fā)射單元算武器較少。
Naval Targets? CIWS, naval guns, and rockets—are those missiles just for show? No navy in the world conducts exercises constantly using CIWS or naval guns. In actual combat, there are almost no opportunities to utilize CIWS. If CIWS is truly needed, it usually indicates a dire or near-desperate situation.
海上目標(biāo)？近防炮、艦炮、火箭彈，那些導(dǎo)彈難道是只是用來觀賞的嗎？沒有一個(gè)國家的海軍演習(xí)中會時(shí)時(shí)刻刻都在用近防炮或艦炮，實(shí)戰(zhàn)中幾乎沒有機(jī)會使用近防炮，若真要用到近防炮，通常已經(jīng)是接近絕境的處境了。
原創(chuàng)翻譯：龍騰網(wǎng) http://m.top-shui.cn 轉(zhuǎn)載請注明出處
誰說沒有導(dǎo)彈演習(xí)，只是不給蟾蜍看罷了。
@luzhe-y9v China's character is not reserved; if there's something to showcase, they won't hold back. The long-standing practice of integrating rocket artillery, CIWS, and naval guns into naval operations has its reasons. The answer boils down to one key issue: the instability of shipborne missile launch systems. This also includes the design shortcomings of the missiles themselves. If you observe the rare footage of Chinese shipborne missile launches, there's a common weakness—the "low initial velocity," which reveals quite a bit.
@luzhe-y9v 中國的性格並不含蓄有東西秀不會忍著的 , 這三軍萬年火箭炮海軍加個(gè)近防砲艦砲的唯一套路不是沒有原因 , 答案只有一個(gè)艦載導(dǎo)彈發(fā)射系統(tǒng)不穩(wěn)定 , 當(dāng)然也包含艦載導(dǎo)彈本身設(shè)計(jì)達(dá)不了標(biāo) , 你看那些稀有的中國艦載導(dǎo)彈發(fā)射的影像都有一個(gè)共同短版 , "初速慢 "應(yīng)該能窺知一二
好急啊，看戲
@Khan-hd5vn Funny. Chinese laws stipulate that showcasing active and advanced weapons is prohibited, so it's impossible to see them in official videos. China's frigates and air-defense missiles have already been sold to over a dozen countries. China's UVLS is the world's most advanced universal cold-and-hot launch system. Do you not understand that the so-called "low initial velocity" refers to cold launches, where missiles are ejected from the VLS before ignition occurs in mid-air? This type of launch saves fuel and protects the VLS but requires exceptionally advanced attitude control technology. However, this is not a challenge for China, as the country began launching rockets as early as the 1960s.
@Khan-hd5vn 逗，中國的法律規(guī)定現(xiàn)役和先進(jìn)武器裝備不允許秀出來，所以你不可能從官方視頻上看到。 中國的護(hù)衛(wèi)艦和對空導(dǎo)彈已經(jīng)賣到十幾個(gè)國家。中國的uvls是世界最先進(jìn)的冷熱共架發(fā)射系統(tǒng)，你不知道所謂的“初速慢”那是冷發(fā)射，是vls彈射出去的導(dǎo)彈么？ 到了空中才開始點(diǎn)火。這種發(fā)射可以節(jié)省燃料和保護(hù)vls，但是需要非常高超的姿態(tài)控制技術(shù)。但這對中國來說都不是問題，中國最早發(fā)射火箭還是上世紀(jì)60年代的事。