比亞迪1兆瓦充電震撼電動(dòng)汽車行業(yè)?。ㄒ唬?/h1>
BYD’s 1000 kW Charging Shocks the EV World!
譯文簡(jiǎn)介
對(duì)于中國(guó)政府來(lái)說(shuō)，決定向哪家公司提供補(bǔ)貼簡(jiǎn)直是一場(chǎng)噩夢(mèng)，因?yàn)槊總€(gè)電動(dòng)汽車品牌都在試圖超越彼此！
正文翻譯
圖評(píng)論翻譯
很贊 ( 6 )
收藏
Where are all the rare earth materials coming from and who's mining them?
這些稀土材料從何而來(lái)？開采者又是誰(shuí)？
Are countries building the power plants for this?
各國(guó)為此新建發(fā)電廠了嗎？
I wonder if it does more charge cycles if the battery is looked after like other batteries. Slower speeds, keeping between 30and70%... 5000 charge cycles to 80%. A 5 million mile capable battery.
若按常規(guī)電池保養(yǎng)（慢充/保持30%-70%電量區(qū)間）能否提升循環(huán)次數(shù)？假設(shè)5000次循環(huán)后保持80%容量——或許真能實(shí)現(xiàn)500萬(wàn)英里電池壽命？
It is a nightmare for the Chinese government trying to work out which company to pour subsidies into because each EV brand is trying to outdo one another ! So while the "state subsidies" claim may have some weight in it, it is the endless competition between EV manufacturers in China that really drives the game.
對(duì)于中國(guó)政府來(lái)說(shuō)，決定向哪家公司提供補(bǔ)貼簡(jiǎn)直是一場(chǎng)噩夢(mèng)，因?yàn)槊總€(gè)電動(dòng)汽車品牌都在試圖超越彼此！因此，盡管“國(guó)家補(bǔ)貼”的說(shuō)法可能有一定的分量，但真正推動(dòng)這場(chǎng)游戲的是中國(guó)電動(dòng)汽車制造商之間無(wú)休止的競(jìng)爭(zhēng)。
原創(chuàng)翻譯：龍騰網(wǎng) http://m.top-shui.cn 轉(zhuǎn)載請(qǐng)注明出處
1000 KW is insane. In an apartment building of 350 units, you can't have every one charging simultaneously. The demand would be insane. Since it charges in 10 minutes, 350 cars needs 3500 minutes. 58 hours in sequence. Let's say system can service 10 cars charging at once. That could be brought down to 5.8 hours approximate. That is 10 x1000 KW, still an enormous demand. Something is wrong or may be it is 10 MW of demand. Help!
1000 KW 太瘋狂了。在一棟有 350 個(gè)單元的公寓樓里，你不可能讓每個(gè)單元同時(shí)充電。需求會(huì)很瘋狂。由于充電時(shí)間為 10 分鐘，350 輛汽車需要 3500 分鐘。58 小時(shí)連續(xù)充電。假設(shè)系統(tǒng)可以同時(shí)為 10 輛汽車充電。這可以縮短到大約 5.8 小時(shí)。這是 10 x1000 KW，仍然是一個(gè)巨大的需求。有些地方出了問(wèn)題，或者可能是 10 MW 的需求。救命！
Ask Ausgrid, Endeavour and Essential Energy why we can’t have 1000kW chargers everywhere.
詢問(wèn) Ausgrid、Endeavour 和 Essential Energy，為什么我們不能在各地安裝 1000kW 充電器。
Could you give us a list of the chargers currently available that support this charging rate?
您能否向我們提供一份目前支持該充電速率的充電器列表？
Why do they call it 1000kW, why not one mega watt? That's a lot of power.
為什么他們稱之為 1000kW，而不是 1 兆瓦？那可是很大的功率。
This is far better than larger battery (range).
Anyways people will stop evey 300km for Toilet break for 10mins.
Your car will be fully reddy when you come back after emptying the bladder.
This will also lower the cost and need of battery .
Just build 10min charging point everywhere.
這比更大的電池（續(xù)航里程）好得多。
無(wú)論如何，人們每行駛 300 公里就會(huì)停下來(lái)上廁所 10 分鐘。
排空膀胱后回來(lái)時(shí)，您的汽車將完全充滿電。
這也會(huì)降低電池的成本和需求。
只需在任何地方建立 10 分鐘充電點(diǎn)即可。
If a car can do 300 kW flat 10-80% than its fine imo. That 6 minutes in a normal car (75 kWh).
若一輛車能以300千瓦功率從10%充至80%，在我看來(lái)就足夠了。普通車型（75千瓦時(shí)電池）只需6分鐘。
The sites have to have the power available, so what if you put a 1000 kW charger if you can put only 1 of them.
充電站需保證電力供應(yīng)——若只能安裝1個(gè)1000千瓦充電樁，又有何意義？
I begin to doubt what's the charge limit
我開始懷疑充電上限究竟是多少了。
lol.. why do they need to be on top of each other? oh Mr Viking
哈哈……他們?yōu)樯兑ハ嗯时龋颗?，維京先生
I am wondering whether we need that much fast charging, considering how most of EV usage/charging is done at home. While I like the fact that EV charging is now faster than filling up with liquid (fossil) fuels, it really is more of a selling point than a real advantage, most of the time. I also think it is necessary to kill part of the FUD/BS around BEVs but still, my question remains.
Don't get me wrong, I would love to be able to charge that fast when I need to, which would be incredibly rare for me most of the year, if at all.
Last time we used fast charging during a road trip, we really didn't need to but it was convenient and the 350 kW Ionity charger near Perth (Scotland) did a great job at topping up the battery in a very short time (we hadn't finished our coffee catch-up, so I had to move the car out mid coffee). In the entire month we travelled through Europe, we only needed fast charging about 3 times (in addition to the Ionitiy charge), all in the Netherlands (our apartment didn't have EV charging options yet) and we had FastNed close by.
Despite the capacity of the car and charger it charged much slower than the capacity limit, probably due to local grid (charger wasn't very busy) or something. That is the other thing, charger/charge capacity don't always tell the whole story and in NZ we're seeing batteries as integral part of the fast chargers, resulting in high rates of charge.
Anyway, I do think there are currently more positives than negatives to ultra fast charging infrastructure.
考慮到大多數(shù)電動(dòng)汽車的使用/充電都是在家里進(jìn)行的，我想知道我們是否需要那么多的快速充電。雖然我喜歡電動(dòng)汽車充電現(xiàn)在比加滿液體（化石）燃料更快的事實(shí)，但大多數(shù)時(shí)候，這實(shí)際上更多的是一個(gè)賣點(diǎn)，而不是一個(gè)真正的優(yōu)勢(shì)。我還認(rèn)為有必要消除部分圍繞電動(dòng)汽車的 FUD/BS，但我的問(wèn)題仍然存在。
別誤會(huì)我的意思，我希望能夠在需要的時(shí)候如此快速地充電，這對(duì)我來(lái)說(shuō)一年中的大部分時(shí)間都是極其罕見的，如果有的話。
上次我們?cè)诠仿眯兄惺褂每焖俪潆姇r(shí)，我們真的不需要，但它很方便，珀斯（蘇格蘭）附近的 350 kW Ionity 充電器在很短的時(shí)間內(nèi)就為電池充滿電，效果非常好（我們還沒(méi)有喝完咖啡，所以我不得不在喝咖啡中途把車開出去）。整個(gè)月我們?cè)跉W洲旅行，我們只需要快速充電 3 次左右（除了 Ionitiy 充電），都在荷蘭（我們的公寓還沒(méi)有電動(dòng)汽車充電選項(xiàng)），而且我們附近有 FastNed。
盡管汽車和充電器的容量很大，但充電速度卻比容量限制慢得多，可能是由于當(dāng)?shù)仉娋W(wǎng)（充電器不是很忙）或其他原因。這是另一回事，充電器/充電容量并不總是說(shuō)明全部情況，在新西蘭，我們將電池視為快速充電器不可或缺的一部分，從而導(dǎo)致高充電率。
無(wú)論如何，我確實(shí)認(rèn)為超快速充電基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施目前的優(yōu)點(diǎn)多于缺點(diǎn)。
Just completed a trip to Italy and back. 1700 miles for business completed in two days. That’s being on a time budget for you. At no point did I think when crossing the alps at night and in sub zero temperatures… what I really need is an electric car. Three fuel stops that took half an hour tops in total as opposed to tracking down a working charger and waiting
剛剛完成了一次往返意大利的旅行。兩天內(nèi)完成了 1700 英里的商務(wù)旅行。這對(duì)你來(lái)說(shuō)就是在時(shí)間預(yù)算之內(nèi)。在夜晚和零度以下的氣溫下穿越阿爾卑斯山時(shí)，我從來(lái)沒(méi)有想過(guò)……我真正需要的是一輛電動(dòng)汽車。三次加油站總共花了半個(gè)小時(shí)，而不是尋找一個(gè)可以充電的充電器并等待
1. I will believe it when I see it in practice.
2. That is a dangerous amount of current.
3. How much more would the battery cost to deal with this?
4. How much higher is the risk of something going wrong?
5. Well lets just forget about any even trying to pretend EVs would be any better for the environment.
1. 當(dāng)我親眼看到實(shí)際效果時(shí)，我才會(huì)相信。
2. 這是危險(xiǎn)的電流量。
3. 處理這種情況需要多花多少錢購(gòu)買電池？
4. 發(fā)生故障的風(fēng)險(xiǎn)有多大？
5. 好吧，讓我們忘掉任何假裝電動(dòng)汽車對(duì)環(huán)境更好的想法吧。
I thought fast charge would ruined the battery sooner
我曾以為快充會(huì)更快損害電池壽命。
原創(chuàng)翻譯：龍騰網(wǎng) http://m.top-shui.cn 轉(zhuǎn)載請(qǐng)注明出處
bad news to distribution substations.
對(duì)配電變電站來(lái)說(shuō)是個(gè)壞消息。（高功率充電對(duì)電網(wǎng)基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施的壓力）
The faster EVs can charge, the less number of charging points will be needed..
電動(dòng)汽車充電越快，所需充電樁數(shù)量就越少。
If they ever get the self driving technology down then EVs could be scheduled to drive over to charging stations at prebooked times when the owners is asleep or at work to charge up. Looks like gas stati9on attendants will have future employment to handle this.
如果他們真的掌握了自動(dòng)駕駛技術(shù)，那么電動(dòng)汽車就可以在車主睡覺或上班時(shí)按預(yù)定時(shí)間駛往充電站充電。看來(lái)加油站服務(wù)員將來(lái)會(huì)有工作來(lái)處理這件事。
Can see it making Australia when they can’t even get decent charegers here. Tesla s the only that has it together in Australia
可以想象，當(dāng)澳大利亞連像樣的充電器都買不到時(shí)，特斯拉就成了澳大利亞唯一一家擁有這些充電器的公司
Pumping that much power into battery's should be safe right ???
Hope the cars don't start exploding, hope the battery's don't short circuit :(
給電池注入那么多電應(yīng)該是安全的吧???
希望汽車不會(huì)爆炸，希望電池不會(huì)短路
Which is better on a highway rest stop /charging station? 10 superchargers that can charge to 80% in 10 minutes or 20 chargers that can charge to 80% in 20 minutes?
在高速公路休息站/充電站上，哪個(gè)更好？10 個(gè)可以在 10 分鐘內(nèi)充電至 80% 的超級(jí)充電站，還是 20 個(gè)可以在 20 分鐘內(nèi)充電至 80% 的充電器？
Why is everyone doing the EV game better than Tesla
為什么每個(gè)人都在電動(dòng)汽車領(lǐng)域比特斯拉做得更好
Talk to me when they have 1mWh in every state... lol
當(dāng)每個(gè)州都有 1mWh 的時(shí)候跟我說(shuō)話...哈哈
Sweden is building the world's first permanent electrified road for EVs to charge while driving
瑞典正在建設(shè)世界上第一條永久性電氣化道路，供電動(dòng)汽車在行駛過(guò)程中充電
This is the nuke I am waiting for legacy car makers
這是我期待的傳統(tǒng)汽車制造商推出的核彈
time to pile into lithium stocks
是時(shí)候買進(jìn)鋰股了
Why do we call it 1000 kw instead of 1mw?
為什么我們稱之為1000kw而不是1mw？
Nissan has prime locations that would be great for Tesla Dealerships and Maintenance.
日產(chǎn)擁有優(yōu)越的地理位置，非常適合特斯拉經(jīng)銷和維護(hù)。
1MW charging doesn't excite me because I'll never use it, and I don't need it anyway. Potential EV drivers need to understand that charging an EV as fast they can pump gas isn't necessary. My Bolt charges no faster than 50 kW, and it's rarely a problem. I usually charge overnight, and when I don't, waiting 30-45 minutes to charge to 80% is not a terrible burden. I have plenty of time to eat, use the bathroom, browse the web or whatever before returning to the road. 150 kW would be an improvement, but I don't see much marginal value in a higher charge rate, not for my needs anyway.
1MW 充電速度并沒(méi)有讓我感到興奮，因?yàn)槲矣肋h(yuǎn)不會(huì)使用它，而且我無(wú)論如何也不需要它。潛在的電動(dòng)汽車駕駛員需要明白，沒(méi)有必要以加油的速度給電動(dòng)汽車充電。我的 Bolt 充電速度不超過(guò) 50 kW，這很少是個(gè)問(wèn)題。我通常在夜間充電，如果我不這樣做，等待 30-45 分鐘充電至 80% 并不是什么大負(fù)擔(dān)。我有足夠的時(shí)間吃飯、上廁所、瀏覽網(wǎng)頁(yè)或做其他事情，然后再回到路上。150 kW 會(huì)有所改善，但我認(rèn)為更高的充電率不會(huì)帶來(lái)太多的邊際價(jià)值，至少對(duì)我來(lái)說(shuō)不是。
Alright. Interesting how the batteries look like in 5 years
好吧。有趣的是5年后電池的樣子
What is the power? 1250 amps at 800v requires a lot of copper, 3 sets of 600 kcmil (1” copper). Copper crooks going to go crazy on this, nevermind the weight of the cables.
功率是多少？1250 安培、800 伏特需要大量銅，3 組 600 kcmil（1 英寸）銅。銅騙子會(huì)為此發(fā)瘋，更不用說(shuō)電纜的重量了。
are you pretty sure that it is really 1000KW?? let's say the battery voltage is 800V, the current will be 1250A, and do you know how thick the cable will be to handle more than 1000A current ?? the cable may be thicker than your leg.
你確定它真的是 1000KW 嗎？假設(shè)電池電壓為 800V，電流為 1250A，你知道處理超過(guò) 1000A 的電流需要多粗的電纜嗎？電纜可能比你的腿還粗。
Chinese EV drivers will be able to charge their EV's in under 10 minutes and will laugh at EV drivers in the US who take 30 minutes to charge their EV's at Electrify America, EvGo, or Tesla superchargers.
中國(guó)的電動(dòng)汽車司機(jī)將能夠在 10 分鐘內(nèi)為他們的電動(dòng)汽車充滿電，并會(huì)嘲笑美國(guó)的電動(dòng)汽車司機(jī)在 美國(guó)電氣、EvGo 或 Tesla 超級(jí)充電站上花 30 分鐘為他們的電動(dòng)汽車充電。
With 1000kw charging… is there any heat problems? Or risk of fire?
1000千瓦充電……會(huì)不會(huì)有熱量問(wèn)題？或者有火災(zāi)風(fēng)險(xiǎn)？
原創(chuàng)翻譯：龍騰網(wǎng) http://m.top-shui.cn 轉(zhuǎn)載請(qǐng)注明出處
Showing unrealistic video clips for high-speed charging. All video clips were showing AC charging with cables suitable for up to 22 kW. The DC ports were left completely covered. It would be realistic to show at least what a 350 kW Charging plug looks like - plus the super thick cable. I do like the idea of BYD supporting 2 charging ports - so when available at the charging station you can speed up your charge stop.
展示不切實(shí)際的高速充電視頻片段。所有視頻片段都展示交流充電，電纜適用于高達(dá) 22 kW。直流端口被完全覆蓋。展示至少 350 kW 充電插頭的樣子是現(xiàn)實(shí)的 - 加上超粗的電纜。我確實(shí)喜歡比亞迪支持 2 個(gè)充電端口的想法 - 因此當(dāng)充電站有充電端口時(shí)，您可以加快充電速度。
The practical limit to charging speed has always been stiffness of the charging cable. More copper and more insulation makes the cable stiff, and it must also be cooled. A megawatt has always been the practical limit, at a thousand volts with a thousand amps about all you can get in a hollow wire assembly running hot that isn't too stiff to handle at minus 40 to plug the car in while the cable is cold. With the electronics available decades ago with cost a decreasing issue. The only limit the battery has ever imposed has always been how large the battery had to be to accept the desired charging speed. The other issue of course is that if you have a charging station with 20 charging stalls only a few can charge at a megawatt.
Nothing in this video is pushing near the engineering practical limit. It is all still just cost constrained. I'm underwhelmed.
充電速度的實(shí)際限制一直是充電電纜的硬度。更多的銅和更多的絕緣層會(huì)使電纜變硬，而且還必須冷卻。兆瓦一直是實(shí)際的限制，在 1000 伏特和 1000 安培的電壓下，在空心導(dǎo)線組件中，在零下 40 度的溫度下，當(dāng)電纜冷卻時(shí)，插入汽車電源，這幾乎是你能得到的全部。幾十年前，隨著電子產(chǎn)品的出現(xiàn)，成本不斷下降。電池施加的唯一限制一直是電池必須有多大才能接受所需的充電速度。當(dāng)然，另一個(gè)問(wèn)題是，如果你有一個(gè)有 20 個(gè)充電位的充電站，只有少數(shù)幾個(gè)可以以兆瓦的速度充電。
這段視頻中沒(méi)有任何內(nèi)容接近工程實(shí)際極限。這一切仍然只是成本限制。我感到很失望。
How many electric car drivers will now go to the psychologist? We won't have time to buy a hot dog when we're charging at these speeds, so we'll get stressed
現(xiàn)在有多少電動(dòng)汽車司機(jī)會(huì)去看心理醫(yī)生？以這樣的速度充電，我們都沒(méi)有時(shí)間買熱狗，所以我們會(huì)感到壓力
原創(chuàng)翻譯：龍騰網(wǎng) http://m.top-shui.cn 轉(zhuǎn)載請(qǐng)注明出處
It’s cool but the whole point to an ev is that you can just charge at home. I would rather see progress in batteries and prices.
這很酷，但電動(dòng)車的重點(diǎn)在于你可以在家里充電。我更希望看到電池和價(jià)格方面的進(jìn)步。
The dilemma with EV charging infrastructure is that most EV users charge at home over night, so fast chargers are only used by mostly by long distance travellers. If you build a lot of them, as ubiquitous as gas stations, they won't get enough utilization to make a profit. If you don't build as many, only a couple of them along busy highways, then it deters people - especially apartment dwellers from buying EVs because of inconvinience.
電動(dòng)汽車充電基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施的難題在于，大多數(shù)電動(dòng)汽車用戶晚上在家充電，因此快速充電器主要供長(zhǎng)途旅行者使用。如果你建了很多這樣的充電器，像加油站一樣無(wú)處不在，它們的利用率就不夠，無(wú)法盈利。如果你建的充電器數(shù)量不多，只在繁忙的高速公路沿線建幾個(gè)，那么就會(huì)因?yàn)椴环奖愣柚谷藗儭绕涫枪⒕用褓?gòu)買電動(dòng)汽車。
I’m not against electric cars, they definitely have their place, but..whilst this sounds all well and good , charging at that rate will generate an insane amount of heat and heat is the natural enemy of anything electrical..
1 MW of power in 10 mins at a charging station where there may be >5 charging points all charging at the same time. from an engineering point of view this has the potential to end up in a lot of tears.
Imagine filling up a 50,000l swimming pool in 10 mins, that’s the equivalence we are talking about hear..
我并不反對(duì)電動(dòng)汽車，它們肯定有自己的一席之地，但是……雖然這聽起來(lái)不錯(cuò)，但以這種速度充電會(huì)產(chǎn)生大量熱量，而熱量是任何電器的天敵……
在一個(gè)可能有 5 個(gè)以上充電點(diǎn)同時(shí)充電的充電站，10 分鐘內(nèi)會(huì)產(chǎn)生 1 兆瓦的電力。從工程角度來(lái)看，這可能會(huì)導(dǎo)致很多麻煩。
想象一下在 10 分鐘內(nèi)填滿一個(gè) 50000 升的游泳池，這就是我們?cè)谶@里談?wù)摰牡葍r(jià)物……
原創(chuàng)翻譯：龍騰網(wǎng) http://m.top-shui.cn 轉(zhuǎn)載請(qǐng)注明出處
1000 KW is 1MW.
1000千瓦等于1MW。
Let’s all cream our jeans over 1000kW charging. Whoopie! Installing the infrastructure to support this is a pipe dream. The plan is convert all motor transport to EV, right?
20 million plus registered motor vehicles in Australia alone.
Using solar and wind?
Ohms Law.
The Laws of Thermodynamics.
Do the maths.
You don’t have to be an Electrical Engineer.
讓我們都為 1000kW 充電而歡呼吧。哇哦！安裝支持這一技術(shù)的基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施簡(jiǎn)直是白日夢(mèng)。計(jì)劃是將所有機(jī)動(dòng)車轉(zhuǎn)換為電動(dòng)汽車，對(duì)嗎？
僅在澳大利亞就有 2000 多萬(wàn)輛注冊(cè)機(jī)動(dòng)車。
使用太陽(yáng)能和風(fēng)能？
歐姆定律。
熱力學(xué)定律。
算一下。
您不必是電氣工程師。
we need more cycles not faster charging. 30min is enought. develop 5000 cycles
我們需要更多的循環(huán)，而不是快速充電。30 分鐘就足夠了。開發(fā) 5000 個(gè)循環(huán)
CHARGE FULLY TO 100% IN 10 MINUTES? *WHAT COULD GO WRONG??!!*
1) THE BATTERY WILL GET WHITE HOT AND EXPLODE!!
2) REFER TO POINT #1
3) REFER TO POINT #1
RINSE AND REPEAT!!
10 分鐘內(nèi)充滿電至 100%？*可能出什么問(wèn)題？！！*
1) 電池會(huì)變得白熱并爆炸！！
2) 請(qǐng)參閱第一條
3) 請(qǐng)參閱第一條
重復(fù)此操作！！
All this is fine and I welcome it as it destroys all the idiots that argue charging is too slow. But, I only stop to have a break. If I'm only going to the toilet I need at least 10 minutes to get there and back. If I want to eat as well it will mean either sitting in the car for 10 minutes until the car has what I need and then moving it or parking having the rest stop then charging. I prefer slower charging so I don't have to wait or repark.
這一切都很好，我對(duì)此表示歡迎，因?yàn)樗輾Я怂姓J(rèn)為充電太慢的白癡。但是，我只停下來(lái)休息一下。如果我只是去廁所，我至少需要 10 分鐘才能往返。如果我還想吃東西，那就意味著要么坐在車?yán)?10 分鐘，直到車?yán)镉形倚枰臇|西，然后開走，要么停車休息，然后充電。我更喜歡慢一點(diǎn)的充電，這樣我就不必等待或重新停車。
Batteries just love super fast charging. So does my wallet.
電池喜歡超快速充電。我的錢包也喜歡。
doesn't matter. Autonomous taxis will take over transportation.
沒(méi)關(guān)系。自動(dòng)駕駛出租車將接管交通運(yùn)輸。
All of these "That's impossible" type comments are gonna be hilarious to read in the future.
Look at where we were with oil production 100 years ago compared to now..
It would have been impossible to have as many vehicles as we do now if we still had the same oil production and refinery numbers as we did 100 years ago. It was impossible for some to imagine a world that produced enough oil for everyone to have a car...
Anyways, we will find a way. It may even seem impossible to imagine right now, but we will find a way.
We always do.
You'll see.
所有這些“那是不可能的”類型的評(píng)論在將來(lái)讀起來(lái)都會(huì)很有趣。
看看我們 100 年前的石油產(chǎn)量與現(xiàn)在相比的情況。
如果我們的石油產(chǎn)量和煉油廠數(shù)量仍與 100 年前相同，那么我們不可能擁有像現(xiàn)在這么多的車輛。有些人無(wú)法想象一個(gè)生產(chǎn)足夠讓每個(gè)人都擁有汽車的世界……
無(wú)論如何，我們會(huì)找到辦法的?，F(xiàn)在甚至似乎無(wú)法想象，但我們會(huì)找到辦法的。
我們總是這樣做。
你會(huì)看到的。
Now all I have to do is find a woman I don't like that has cancer,
grift unsuspecting good hearted individuals on the internet , telling them I need special treatment to save her life that I can't afford,
Wait for the money to roll in & buy 2 new cars what will have super fast charging.
Note to self: Keep quiet about the 2 new cars. If I'm broke & unable to afford my wife's health care some people may find it suspect that I can buy 2 new cars.
現(xiàn)在我要做的就是找到一個(gè)我不喜歡的患有癌癥的女人，
在網(wǎng)上欺騙毫無(wú)戒心的好心人，告訴他們我需要特殊治療來(lái)挽救她的生命，而我負(fù)擔(dān)不起，
等錢滾滾而來(lái)，買兩輛新車，還有超快充電功能。
提醒自己：對(duì)這兩輛新車保持沉默。如果我身無(wú)分文，無(wú)法負(fù)擔(dān)妻子的醫(yī)療費(fèi)用，有些人可能會(huì)懷疑我能買兩輛新車。