18禁在线看,亚洲Aⅴ午夜福利精品一区

@asianthor
This is the attitude that I wish all my Indian brothers and sisters would have. As two nations that have existed for thousands of years and have coexisted and have share much, and those differences that our countries have should be worked out for a more prosperous India and China. Between India and China we have 40% of the total population of the world. The two nations have a tremendous work force, resourceful population, great engineers, and that is why the USA along with the Europeans put a wedge between India and China, they fear that both countries would unite and help each other rise economically and leave in the dust the Western world, namely the USA. India and China, China and India could definitely lead the world, but the USA will not allow it.

這是我希望所有印度的兄弟姐妹都能擁有的態(tài)度。作為兩個存在了數(shù)千年、共同生活并分享了很多東西的國家，我們應(yīng)該為了更繁榮的印度和中國而解決我們之間的分歧。印度和中國加起來占世界總?cè)丝诘?0%，這兩個國家擁有龐大的勞動力、資源豐富的人口、優(yōu)秀的工程師，這就是為什么美國和歐洲要在印度和中國之間制造隔閡的原因，他們害怕兩國聯(lián)合起來，在經(jīng)濟上互相幫助崛起，把西方世界尤其是美國遠遠拋在后面。中國和印度絕對可以領(lǐng)導(dǎo)世界，但美國不會允許。
原創(chuàng)翻譯：龍騰網(wǎng) http://m.top-shui.cn 轉(zhuǎn)載請注明出處

@user-ht7jt2gr5j
As an Indian, for me China is fully advanced country in many many areas - Olympics, technology, traditional culture, manufacturing, defense, Integrated farming and many many more areas. I wish India & China can develop long lasting friendships that used to exist a few centuries ago.

作為一個印度人，對我來說中國在很多很多領(lǐng)域都是完全先進的國家 - 奧運會、科技、傳統(tǒng)文化、制造業(yè)、國防、綜合農(nóng)業(yè)等等許多領(lǐng)域。我希望印度和中國能發(fā)展幾個世紀(jì)前曾經(jīng)存在過的長久友誼。

@Hasnanembong
imagine how great it would be if the Indian and Chinese work together. They are neighbours, the same proportion of land mass and population of billions. In Malaysia Indian and Chinese make pretty and smart babies. If only the propaganda and hatred can be wiped out that easy.

想象一下，如果印度人和中國人一起工作會有多棒。他們是鄰居，擁有相似比例的土地面積和數(shù)十億人口。在馬來西亞，印度人和中國人會生出漂亮聰明的寶寶。要是宣傳和仇恨能那么容易消除就好了。
原創(chuàng)翻譯：龍騰網(wǎng) http://m.top-shui.cn 轉(zhuǎn)載請注明出處

@prasun12377
@foodparadise5792 we always have respect for what you guys have achieved by sheer hardwork and perseverance. Propaganda does not exist..only disagreement we have is your ( your gov) approach to expansionism ..I mean your gov's policy of forceful occupancy of Tbet and some other parts.. and every body has right to defend their sovereignty by hook and crook

@foodparadise5792 我們一直尊重你們通過純粹的努力和毅力所取得的成就，不存在宣傳..我們唯一的分歧是你們(你們的政府)的擴張主義做法..我指的是你們的政府對*z和其他一些地區(qū)的強行占領(lǐng)政策..每個人都有權(quán)不擇手段地捍衛(wèi)自己的主權(quán)。

@tanujtripathi6064
10k dollars per capita(china) vs 60k dollars per capita(USA) china is way back interms of research and development, USA outsourced pollution to china via manufacturing and you think china is closer to USA

中國人均1萬美元 vs 美國人均6萬美元，中國在研發(fā)方面遠遠落后，美國通過制造業(yè)將污染外包給中國，而你卻認(rèn)為中國更接近美國。

@dhivyagurusamy3338
Very true. I work with Chinese for several years now. They are finest, hardworking and very respectful. There is lot for us to learn from people of China

非常正確。我和中國人一起工作已經(jīng)好幾年了，他們是最優(yōu)秀的、勤奮的、非常值得尊重的。我們有很多東西可以向中國人民學(xué)習(xí)。

@kanyeeast-i8f
Biggest joke is even if the americans buy directly from China even after paying 150+% tariff it will be still way cheaper than what their own company charges them

最大的笑話是即使美國人在支付150%以上的關(guān)稅后直接從中國購買，仍然比他們自己公司收取的費用便宜得多。

@deeprollingriver52
I'm so glad I'm over parading my "luxury" around to show off. I sold all of mine and kept only 5 reasonably cost bags. Nobody noticed what I was carrying and nobody cared. Neither do I.

我很高興我不再炫耀我的"奢侈品"了。我賣掉了所有的包，只保留了5個價格合理的包。沒有人注意到我?guī)Я耸裁矗矝]有人在乎。我也不在乎。
原創(chuàng)翻譯：龍騰網(wǎng) http://m.top-shui.cn 轉(zhuǎn)載請注明出處

@RojaJaneman
I always stayed away from people that showed off. Especially with junk that they paid 20-30x extra. It always showed me which people r dim

我總是遠離那些炫耀的人，特別是那些花了20-30倍價錢買垃圾的人，這總是能讓我看出哪些人是愚蠢的。
原創(chuàng)翻譯：龍騰網(wǎng) http://m.top-shui.cn 轉(zhuǎn)載請注明出處

@yongkysiaw6597
It's always been that way. Who fucking care what a person wear. As long as it fits and looks good on them, that's the only thing that matters.

一直都是這樣，誰他媽在乎一個人穿什么。只要合身好看，這才是唯一重要的事情。

@bhavikasicka7871
@RojaJaneman Dim, but still richer than you. 200k USD is loose change for the Ambanis, but it's more than your entire generational wealth is worth

@RojaJaneman 雖然他們愚蠢，但他們?nèi)匀槐饶愀挥小?0萬美元對安巴尼家族來說是小錢，但比你整個家族的財富還多。

@CogitoTesting
Tsun Zu said keep your secret as dark as night and then strike like a thunderbolt. This is one of China's thunderbolts. R.I.P. luxury brands. The trade war is over.

孫子說"靜若處女，動如脫兔"。這就是中國的雷霆一擊，奢侈品牌安息吧，貿(mào)易戰(zhàn)結(jié)束了。

@classicpianoman1486
All those brands featured in these videos are European brands. Your in a trade war with the U.S., none of this affects us.

這些視頻中出現(xiàn)的所有品牌都是歐洲品牌。你們是在和美國打貿(mào)易戰(zhàn)，這些對我們沒有影響。

@classicpianoman1486
@CogitoTesting We are the customer/ buyers. You need/want our buisness. We don't need your products. So yes, I'm sure. Your doing our work for us, by showing exactly why U.S. and Europeon workers deserve to be paid fair wages. This is the whole point of the tarrifs. You are shooting yourselves in the foot with this strategy.

@CogitoTesting 我們是客戶/買家，你們需要/想要我們的生意。我們不需要你們的產(chǎn)品。所以是的，我很確定。你們在幫我們做事，通過展示為什么美國和歐洲工人應(yīng)該得到公平的工資，這就是關(guān)稅的全部意義。你們這是在搬起石頭砸自己的腳。
原創(chuàng)翻譯：龍騰網(wǎng) http://m.top-shui.cn 轉(zhuǎn)載請注明出處

@darkismkayla
Let's be honest. The luxury market isn't that expensive if you produce it at cost and take off the logo. The luxury logo is about 80% of the actual price. But the fact is that you're buying the image, showing off your taste, and making them think you have more money than you actually do, which is a very good thing.

說實話。如果你按成本生產(chǎn)并去掉logo，奢侈品并沒有那么貴。奢侈品的logo約占實際價格的80%。但事實是你買的是形象，是炫耀你的品味，讓他們覺得你比實際更有錢，這是一件非常棒的事情。

@EnochIsComing
I whole heartedly support this, we should not be spending our lives working for these...

我全心全意支持這一點，我們不應(yīng)該把生命浪費在為這些東西工作上...

@RojaJaneman
Y did anyone believe it at all? I knew this even as a child. Without anyone telling me. I remember how desi men would wear suits in Indian summer weddings. And I used to think, my uncles r stupid as they'd complain about heat and b all sweaty. As a child I'd lost all respect for desi adults

為什么會有人相信這個？我小時候就知道這個了，沒有人告訴我。我記得印度男人在印度夏季婚禮上穿西裝的樣子。我過去常常想，我的叔叔們很愚蠢，因為他們會抱怨炎熱，渾身是汗。作為一個孩子，我對印度成年人失去了所有的尊重。

@shumbuk4383
@RojaJaneman same but a baffling number have no intuition or are so conformist that nothing changes..

@RojaJaneman 我也一樣，但令人困惑的是很多人沒有直覺，或者太墨守成規(guī)，以至于沒有任何改變..

@MsSavoy
I worked for Dior and Stella Mccartney. This is known in the luxury world. China makes the bags because they have the manufacturers and skill. They ship them to luxury brands in France or Italy and they repackage them and put their logos on those bags. For example Louis Vuitton repackages their hand made leather bags made in China and sell them for thousands of dollars in their boutiques. Lululemon does the same thing. It's basically drop shipping!!

我在Dior和Stella McCartney工作過，這在奢侈品界是眾所周知的。中國制造這些包是因為他們有制造商和技術(shù)。他們把包運到法國或意大利的奢侈品牌那里，然后重新包裝，貼上他們的logo。例如，路易威登重新包裝在中國手工制作的皮包，然后在他們的精品店以數(shù)千美元的價格出售。Lululemon也在做同樣的事情。這基本上就是代發(fā)貨!!

@greggm7917
When I worked at a Shanghai MSP called SSBG Ltd ( still exists), we had a French client where they took in clothing items without any labels and added various famous brands. Otherwise, you could not tell two shirts or ties apart. China is doing a good thing by blowing the lid off of "luxury".

當(dāng)我在上海的一家叫SSBG有限公司的MSP工作時(現(xiàn)在還存在)，我們有一個法國客戶，他們接收沒有任何標(biāo)簽的服裝，然后加上各種名牌。否則，你無法區(qū)分兩件襯衫或領(lǐng)帶有什么不同。中國揭開"奢侈品"的蓋子是在做一件好事。

@indocanadianadventure
We Indians dont even enter these display shops (only good for window shopping)- instead go for valuable assets. But folks who earned the money via looting, wars or printing - does not matter.

我們印度人甚至不進這些展示店(只適合櫥窗購物)-而是去購買有價值的資產(chǎn)，但那些通過掠奪、戰(zhàn)爭或印鈔賺錢的人-無所謂。

@SHANKS183
People are not buying bags, they're buying egos. $38K is so worth it to satisfy their egos. Buying the same thing for less is just different.

人們不是在買包，他們是在買自尊。3.8萬美元用來滿足他們的自尊心非常值得，花更少的錢買同樣的東西就是不一樣。

@tundakyat457
Its true!! We believe the Chinese. We in the US have heard that all expensive brands are made in China & other cheap labor countries in the same factory as the cheap items since the 80s & 90s and just the logos are being placed on the item.

這是真的!!我們相信中國人。在美國，我們聽說自上世紀(jì)80年代和90年代以來，所有昂貴的品牌都在中國和其他勞動力廉價的國家生產(chǎn)，和廉價商品在同一個工廠生產(chǎn)，只是貼上不同的logo。

@abhinavpiyush3619
It's not only about cheap labour but also about skills you can't compete with them

這不僅僅是廉價勞動力的問題，還有你無法與他們競爭的技能。

@Mclovin96X
Same in dress market. Most expensive fashion items made in dharavi slum and sell in Europe for thousands of dollars

服裝市場也是如此。最昂貴的時尚單品在達拉維貧民窟制造，然后在歐洲以數(shù)千美元的價格出售。

@TheAjaySharma0
Those Last words felt like some quote Palki Mam.. i can wholeheartedly announce on the behalf of all Indians that..
We are proud to have a Dynamic Personality like you and will follow you till the last mile..
Let's show the world, The Indian Dimension of NEWS.

最后那些話聽起來像是Palki女士的名言..我謹(jǐn)代表所有印度人衷心宣布..
我們?yōu)閾碛邢衲@樣充滿活力的人而感到自豪，并將追隨您直到最后一刻..
讓我們向世界展示新聞的印度維度。

@gauravdp
There's a saying that, "A fool and his money are soon parted", that's exactly what has been happening here. Thanks to China for exposing this racket, you can't fool all the people all the time.

有句諺語說，"愚人和他的錢很快就會分開"，這正是這里發(fā)生的情況。感謝中國揭露了這個騙局，你不能永遠愚弄所有人。
原創(chuàng)翻譯：龍騰網(wǎng) http://m.top-shui.cn 轉(zhuǎn)載請注明出處

@PoBx100
Truly wealthy people don’t obsess over flashy brands. They’re not throwing money at overpriced stuff that serves no real purpose. When someone feels the need to constantly show off designer bags, it’s not about class. It’s about trying hard to look like they belong in a world they’re not actually part of. Real wealth is quiet. You don’t stay rich by making other people richer, especially by spending and promoting brands by flashing their brands on the street, that offer no real value.

真正富有的人不會迷戀花哨的品牌，他們不會把錢浪費在毫無實際用途的昂貴物品上。當(dāng)有人覺得需要不斷炫耀設(shè)計師包包時，這與階級無關(guān)，這是在努力讓自己看起來屬于一個他們實際上并不屬于的世界。真正的財富是安靜的。你不會通過讓別人更富有來保持富有，尤其是通過在街上炫耀品牌來消費和推廣品牌，而這些品牌并沒有真正的價值。

@Habib_Osman
Exactly. It's the working poor that judge each other on branded clothes. The rich judge each other based on the work they do, their houses, the universities they and their kids attended and their cars + perhaps on high brow activities too depending on the type of wealthy person. Think of things such as literature knowledge, classical instrument proficiency, high end table manners etc.

完全正確。那些需要工作的窮人才會根據(jù)品牌服裝互相評價。富人則是根據(jù)彼此的工作、房子、他們和孩子上的大學(xué)、汽車，可能還有高雅活動來互相評價，這取決于富人的類型。想想文學(xué)知識、古典樂器演奏能力、高端餐桌禮儀等事情。

@AnilKumar-dk8by
People pay for the logo. Without the logo, quality has no meaning for the rich. Moreover if the same product minus the logo floods the market at a cheap price, they cease to be a high-end product.

人們?yōu)閘ogo買單。沒有l(wèi)ogo，質(zhì)量對富人來說毫無意義。此外，如果去掉logo的相同產(chǎn)品以低價充斥市場，它們就不再是高端產(chǎn)品了。

@joer5571
So you find another site that sells the logo, the clasp, the handle, whatever has the brand name on it, and install it yourself- easily done, there’s the "workaround"... Most "rich" people aren’t bright enough to figure out the difference, anyway...

所以你可以找到另一個賣logo、扣子、把手或其他任何帶有品牌名稱的零件的網(wǎng)站，然后自己安裝——這很容易做到，這就是"變通辦法"...反正大多數(shù)"富人"都不夠聰明，看不出區(qū)別...

@Habib_Osman
That's not true buddy. if you compare an expensive shoe to a cheap shoe for example the differences are massive. I own Meindl boots for example and their quality is something completely outside of normal standards.

這不是真的，朋友。比如說，如果你比較一雙昂貴的鞋子和一雙便宜的鞋子，二者的差別是巨大的。比如我有一雙Meindl靴子，它們的質(zhì)量完全超出了普通標(biāo)準(zhǔn)。
原創(chuàng)翻譯：龍騰網(wǎng) http://m.top-shui.cn 轉(zhuǎn)載請注明出處

@sexyhoney1836
Who really cares about luxury products if most people are not even able to afford such items with years of their salaries- but the sad fact is, it is almost the same with many ordinary items, too. Means any products cheaply produced in Asia cost you in Europe or the USA ten times more, at least.
But this is not only an issue of made in China, it is also valid for many items made in India. The T-Shirt manufactured and sold in India for 300-600 Rs to wholesale and sold in retail for maybe 990 Rs or so brings in Europe under a brand name easily 40-50 Euros or even more which is 3800-4800 Rupees. And in some roadside shops in India you might get the same T-Shirt as B-ware (some little mistakes) or as fake/duplicate for 250 Rupees or less.
And to be clear: this seemingly crazy end price in Europe, if you compare it to the manufacturer's selling rate, includes VAT, and if you calculate that from 50 Euros remain 42 as net price. This price contains 50% margin for the retailer (which does not mean profit also but includes also his costs for transport and sale, personel etc.), means he purchases it for 28 Euros. This price contains the margin of the wholeseller (means also his costs for godown and sales and what not plus his profits) wo paid 18 Euro including tariffs and - maybe - transport.
Means what you can purchase in India in a shop for 1000 Rs or on Amazon for 850 Rs is sold by the manufacturer in India for 500 Rupees maximum, and it costs you behind the border in Europe already 1700 Rs and if you want to get it in a shop in Germany or Austria it might cost you there almost 5000 Rupees. And this is not because somebody is cheating but simply how trade works - there are so many steps between the manufacturer in India and the consumer in Europe and everybody on each step adds his costs and profits and at the end even the government wants to have some out of it, so the consumer pays in the shops 10 times more as if he would pay if he had purchased the exactly same item at the manufacturer's door step.

如果大多數(shù)人甚至用幾年的薪水都買不起奢侈品，誰還會真正關(guān)心奢侈品呢？但可悲的事實是，許多普通商品也是如此。我的意思是在亞洲廉價生產(chǎn)的產(chǎn)品在歐洲或美國至少要便宜十倍。
但這不僅是中國制造的問題，也適用于許多印度制造的商品。在印度以300-600盧比批發(fā)制造和銷售的T恤，其零售價可能在990盧比左右，而在歐洲以品牌的名義可以輕松賣到40-50歐元甚至更多，也就是3800-4800盧比。在印度的一些路邊店，你可能會以250盧比或更低的價格買到與Bware相同的T恤（有些小瑕疵）或假貨/復(fù)制品。
需要明確的是：如果與制造商的銷售價格相比，歐洲這個看似瘋狂的最終價格包含了增值稅，如果從50歐元算起，凈價為42歐元。這個價格包含零售商50%的利潤(這不意味著純利潤，還包括運輸、銷售、人員等成本)，這意味著他以28歐元的價格采購。批發(fā)商支付18歐元，這個價格包含批發(fā)商的利潤(還包括倉庫、銷售等成本加上他的利潤)，關(guān)稅和可能的運輸費。
這意味著你在印度商店花1000盧比或在亞馬遜花850盧比購買的商品，印度制造商的售價最高為500盧比，而在歐洲邊境的價格已經(jīng)是1700盧比，如果你想在德國或奧地利的商店購買，可能要花費近5000盧比。這并不是因為有人在欺騙，而是貿(mào)易的運作方式——從印度制造商到歐洲消費者之間有這么多步驟，每個步驟的人都增加了自己的成本和利潤，最后政府還要從中分一杯羹，所以消費者在商店支付的價格是他在制造商門口購買完全相同商品價格的10倍。

@7415_Gamer
Those who buy expensive stuffs mostly buy status. They want exclusivity and class. When you have money society wants to see you look unique; your house, your cars, etc. This is what luxury manufacturers have capitalized on.

購買昂貴物品的人大多是在購買地位，他們想要獨特性和階級。當(dāng)你有錢時，社會希望看到你看起來與眾不同，包括你的房子、汽車等等。這就是奢侈品制造商利用的東西。

@kanyeeast-i8f
Trump charging 150% tariff on Chinese goods where as American companies charging 10000% tariff from its consumers just the word tariff is replaced with luxury

特朗普對中國商品征收150%的關(guān)稅，而美國公司對消費者收取10000%的關(guān)稅，只是"關(guān)稅"這個詞被"奢侈品"取代了。

@basusudip
Same story for Apple, Google Smart watch, phone, laptops or TVs, washing machines everything. All these US brands are making 80-90% profit. Drop made in China and make in the USA.

蘋果、谷歌智能手表、手機、筆記本電腦或電視、洗衣機等等都是同樣的故事，所有這些美國品牌都獲得了80-90%的利潤。放棄中國制造，在美國制造。

@VictorNwosu-d9b4c
The real value of luxury is the inability of others to afford it… The branding illusion won’t just go down the drain with this Chinese‘expose’ or else wealth loses its pettiness

奢侈品的真正價值在于其他人買不起...這種品牌幻覺不會因為中國的"曝光"就消失，否則財富就失去了它的狹隘性。

@abdiahaji5653
Something is cooking, I can't just tell but something is cooking... diverting the world attention. I tell you something is cooking..

有些事情正在醞釀，我說不清楚但確實有些事情正在醞釀...為了轉(zhuǎn)移世界的注意力。我告訴你，有些事情正在醞釀..

@asmitpikle8660
Its not the product that gets you sales, its the marketing and branding. This move of China will simply give opportunities to other countries.
Thank you China and good luck to India.

讓你獲得銷量的不是產(chǎn)品，而是營銷和品牌。中國的這一舉動只會給其他國家機會。
謝謝中國，祝印度好運。

@tejaspatel973
Wow that’s a strong move by China and Chinese manufacturers. People will start ditching the middle man (Brand name) company and directly by the same quality product directly from manufacturer ???? Which will lead to total collapse of Brand name companies.

哇，這是中國和中國制造商的強力舉措。人們將開始拋棄中間商(品牌公司)，直接從制造商那里購買相同質(zhì)量的產(chǎn)品，這將導(dǎo)致品牌公司的徹底崩潰。

@LLSicilia
wont happen. the brands will use origin of manufacture laws to protect their industry and the asians wont buy knock offs as it's frowned upon

這不會發(fā)生的。品牌將利用原產(chǎn)地制造法律來保護他們的行業(yè)，亞洲人不會購買仿制品，因為這是不受歡迎的。

@GurpreetSingh-fh8gj
The price tag is for the Logo not for material.Everybody knows about the cost to produce of actual material and labour.Without the Logo how rich people are going to show they have paid big bucks for it.

價格標(biāo)簽是為logo而不是為材料設(shè)定的。每個人都知道實際材料和勞動力的生產(chǎn)成本。沒有l(wèi)ogo，富人怎么展示他們?yōu)榇嘶舜箦X呢。

@Bijnori_chora
The most expensive thing I ever bought in my life after my house (on mortgage of course) is my car which I bought for 30,000 .. and there are people who buy bag for 38,000??? What for? To show off not to carry things in it of course

我一生中除了房子(當(dāng)然是按揭的)，買過的最貴的東西是我的車，花了30000美元..而有人花38000美元買一個包？？？為了什么？當(dāng)然是為了炫耀而不是用來裝東西。
原創(chuàng)翻譯：龍騰網(wǎng) http://m.top-shui.cn 轉(zhuǎn)載請注明出處

@cool-aquarian
I’ve been buying cheap unbranded knock off clothes my whole life.?? Premium brands don’t make sense for clothes.
Good that more people(esp american) get enlightened and empowered by this knowledge.

我一生都在購買便宜的無品牌的仿制衣服，高端品牌對衣服來說沒有意義。
很高興更多人(尤其是美國人)因為這個知識而受到啟發(fā)和賦權(quán)。

@StephenHardy-j2l
You are 1000 percent correct If these brands went the way of all flesh 99% of people wouldn't know the difference . You are also right that it is an aspiration towards nothing . Nothing of real substance and certainly nothing of any real value If you have got 38000 to waste on a bag and actually do it then you really need to look hard in the mirror
On a lighter note,I hope everything goes well with your house purchase...Have a good life You obviously have the right priorities and you deserve to succeed in anything that you do

你1000%正確，如果這些品牌消亡，99%的人都不會知道有什么區(qū)別。你也說對了，這是一種對虛無的渴望。沒有任何實質(zhì)性的內(nèi)容，當(dāng)然也沒有任何真正的價值。如果你有38000美元可以浪費在一個包上并且真的這么做了，那么你真的需要好好照照鏡子
說點輕松的，我希望你買房一切順利...祝你生活愉快。你顯然有正確的優(yōu)先事項，你應(yīng)該在你所做的任何事情上取得成功。

@itsace119
Let’s be honest — most people who buy these bags aren’t buying the product itself, but rather the brand. Without the brand name, it’s pretty much worthless. If they wanted a cheap knock-off, they could get one for way less than $1,400 at a dollar store or something

說實話——大多數(shù)購買這些包的人不是在買產(chǎn)品本身，而是在買品牌。沒有品牌名稱，它幾乎一文不值。如果他們想要一個便宜的仿制品，他們可以在一元店之類的地方花遠低于1400美元的價格買到一個。
@嘉義雞肉飯

Don't spend a penny in the US market now because of the 245% duly. I wold buy a
1200roundtripflighttoShanghaiandgoshoppingthere.Becausea100 China price product may become $900 or higher in the US market, well, plus tax.

現(xiàn)在不要在美國市場花一分錢，因為要交245%的關(guān)稅。我寧愿花1200美元買往返上海的機票去那里購物，因為在中國100美元的產(chǎn)品在美國市場可能變成900美元或更高，嗯，還要加稅。

@nimageofmine
Those who are paying 38k for a purse won't bother with additional tarrifs because they already have enough money. So, this might not play out well for China. The actual impact of tarrifs will be to the middle class and low income groups.

那些花3.8萬美元買包的人不會在意額外的關(guān)稅，因為他們已經(jīng)有足夠的錢。所以，這對中國可能不太有利，關(guān)稅實際影響的將是中產(chǎn)階級和低收入群體。

@saniaasan
The irony is that Chinese tourists line up outside the large Louis Vuitton store in Paris, spending thousands of euros on "just the logo"! I've seen it myself. That's rich China - not the same China as the one working hard hours and low wages at leather factories.

諷刺的是中國游客在巴黎大型路易威登店外排隊，花費數(shù)千歐元購買"僅僅是logo"！我親眼所見。那是富有的中國——與在皮革工廠長時間工作、工資低廉的中國不同。

@SMR218
That’s what i don’t underrstand, if in reality the exact same bag is produced in China why are Asians all over Chanel, Hermes and LV boutiques? I doubt these tik tok is totally true. But to es y their own. It’s nobody’s business how people spend their money. It’s their choice. You can laugh and call them idiots if that makes you feel good about yourself.

這就是我不明白的地方，如果實際上完全相同的包是在中國生產(chǎn)的，為什么亞洲人還擠滿香奈兒、愛馬仕和路易威登的精品店？我懷疑這些Tiktok視頻是否完全真實。但這是他們自己的事，人們?nèi)绾位ㄥX不關(guān)任何人的事，這是他們的選擇。如果這讓你自我感覺良好，你可以嘲笑他們，稱他們?yōu)榘装V。

我們制作了鑲嵌鉆石的喜馬拉雅鉑金包